Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

View Poll Results: New Revi gun sight vs old.
I like the new patch Revi gun sight 35 58.33%
I like the old patch Revi gun sight 25 41.67%
Voters: 60. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-13-2011, 12:03 PM
ZaltysZ's Avatar
ZaltysZ ZaltysZ is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lithuania
Posts: 426
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II View Post
Are you sure about this?
Yes, but pay attention to "in relation to glass". If you move closer, you can say: reticle gets smaller in relation to glass, and you can also say glass gets bigger in relation to reticle - depending on which reference point you like.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-13-2011, 12:10 PM
Sternjaeger II Sternjaeger II is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,903
Default

guys, make a little experiment yourselves: sit in your car and put a square piece of white paper on your dashboard, it will show its reflection on the windscreen: if you move your head forward and backward it gives the impression of changing in size, but it actually doesn't, it's only because you're looking at it from a different distance, to further prove this put your fingers on the edges of the reflected piece of paper, you will see it doesn't change.

German gunsights worked with the "dominant eye" principle: statistically most people have a right dominant eye, that's why it was a bit offset to the right.

As someone else mentioned above, it's the same thing with the red dot sights that you can now mount on guns: people keep on doing the mistake of closing one of their eyes to aim, but it's meant for natural shooting, all you need to do is look at the red dot, place it on the target and it's a hit.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-13-2011, 08:44 PM
41Sqn_Stormcrow
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II View Post
guys, make a little experiment yourselves: sit in your car and put a square piece of white paper on your dashboard, it will show its reflection on the windscreen: if you move your head forward and backward it gives the impression of changing in size, but it actually doesn't, it's only because you're looking at it from a different distance, to further prove this put your fingers on the edges of the reflected piece of paper, you will see it doesn't change.

German gunsights worked with the "dominant eye" principle: statistically most people have a right dominant eye, that's why it was a bit offset to the right.

As someone else mentioned above, it's the same thing with the red dot sights that you can now mount on guns: people keep on doing the mistake of closing one of their eyes to aim, but it's meant for natural shooting, all you need to do is look at the red dot, place it on the target and it's a hit.
+1

I endorse this. It took me a fair bit of time and a good deal of patience from Lixma (where is this guy btw. Was always nice to discuss with him) until I understood. And made my own little experiments that confirmed this.

One eye looking through the sight with the other eye open will make the circle wobble apparently in the air as long as the one eye catches the circle. This is how it should be implemented.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.