Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-13-2011, 12:47 AM
GF_Mastiff's Avatar
GF_Mastiff GF_Mastiff is offline
71st_Mastiff
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: EL Centro
Posts: 890
Default

nope should I be more clear the Beta patch2 and there landing gear is always down too. SO FM is not working correctly and you guys are full of it cause you dont want the correct setting to lose against a spit Ia.
__________________
71st Eagle Squadron
www.anon6.com - Blogger on DCS Series
71st Mastiff's You-Tube
" any failure you meet is never a defeat; merely a set up for a greater come back "
Asus||i7x5930k||16gb3200||GTX10808gb||ATX1200Corsa ir||CBTitanium7.1||Win10x64||TrackIr4Pro/ir||gladiator pro mkII||siatekpedals||X52Throttle||G15Keyboard/RazerMouse||
32"LCD||2x7" lilliputs,1x9inc
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-13-2011, 01:48 AM
CWMV's Avatar
CWMV CWMV is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 758
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GF_Mastiff View Post
nope should I be more clear the Beta patch2 and there landing gear is always down too. SO FM is not working correctly and you guys are full of it cause you dont want the correct setting to lose against a spit Ia.
Dude-You do realize that we see your gear down too, right?
Lol!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by banned View Post
Just fix the friggin thing you boof heads. It's getting boring now. Only 11 people on the whole thing. Yawn.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-13-2011, 02:03 AM
VO101_Tom's Avatar
VO101_Tom VO101_Tom is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 799
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GF_Mastiff View Post
nope should I be more clear the Beta patch2 and there landing gear is always down too. SO FM is not working correctly and you guys are full of it cause you dont want the correct setting to lose against a spit Ia.
Hi. The landing gear is a well-known visual bug. Disturbing because only you see and you fly different way. But it is retracted. It happened several times already, i saw on 109 and Hurricane too.
The FM miracles... track or video...?
__________________
| AFBs of CloD 2[/URL] |www.pumaszallas.hu

i7 7700K 4.8GHz, 32GB Ram 3GHz, MSI GTX 1070 8GB, 27' 1920x1080, W10/64, TrackIR 4Pro, G940
Cliffs of Dover Bugtracker site: share and vote issues here
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-13-2011, 03:40 AM
CaptainDoggles's Avatar
CaptainDoggles CaptainDoggles is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GF_Mastiff View Post
nope should I be more clear the Beta patch2 and there landing gear is always down too. SO FM is not working correctly and you guys are full of it cause you dont want the correct setting to lose against a spit Ia.
Hahaha is this guy actually trying to say that 109s are overmodeled? That'd be a first for this series. What a novel idea! A 109 that performs historically!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-13-2011, 04:59 AM
ZaltysZ's Avatar
ZaltysZ ZaltysZ is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lithuania
Posts: 426
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GF_Mastiff View Post
nope should I be more clear the Beta patch2 and there landing gear is always down too. SO FM is not working correctly and you guys are full of it cause you dont want the correct setting to lose against a spit Ia.
Either you need BF109 with fixed pitch prop or Spit I with CSP, if you want BF to be not so good against Spit I. BF isn't overmodeled, just Spit I wastes lots of energy because of prop.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-13-2011, 05:34 AM
David198502's Avatar
David198502 David198502 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,536
Default

funny post of the OP.
i had a guy atag who was really upset because he got killed by a 109 and was calling us "blues" puss... because of flying with these overmodeled noob planes.that was funny as well....maybe its the same guy?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-13-2011, 04:52 PM
Ze-Jamz Ze-Jamz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: On your six!!
Posts: 2,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GF_Mastiff View Post
nope should I be more clear the Beta patch2 and there landing gear is always down too. SO FM is not working correctly and you guys are full of it cause you dont want the correct setting to lose against a spit Ia.
I love this Pic so much but today I think the post I have quoted just needs a bit of the 'chomp master'

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-13-2011, 07:02 PM
ATAG_Snapper's Avatar
ATAG_Snapper ATAG_Snapper is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,286
Default

Dunno about the 109's being over modelled, but I can vouch that the darned 109 PILOTS on the ATAG server are over modelled. They're just plain NASTY!!!!! LOL
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-14-2011, 05:45 AM
KeBrAnTo's Avatar
KeBrAnTo KeBrAnTo is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Madrid, SPAIN
Posts: 99
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GF_Mastiff View Post
nope should I be more clear the Beta patch2 and there landing gear is always down too. SO FM is not working correctly and you guys are full of it cause you dont want the correct setting to lose against a spit Ia.
Lol, get back to 1946 for the 109 FM you like for your uber spits.
__________________
Former member of:
StG111 2003-2005 | SG1 2006-2009 | 15.Span 2010-2011


CPU Intel i7 920 @ 2.67 -> OC 4 Ghz MB ASUS P6T Cooler Noctua NH-D14 Memory 12GB
GPU 2x nVidia 285 GTX 1GB SLI HD 2x SATAII WD VelociRaptor 150GB RAID 0
SB ASUS Xonar DS/DT 7.1 PSU Tagan 1100W OS W7 Ult.64 LCD LG W2284F-PF
TrackIR 3 Pro + Saitek X-52 + Saitek Pro Rudders Pedals + Pro Flight Throttle Quadrant + Saitek PcDash 2
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-14-2011, 06:01 AM
reflected reflected is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 346
Default

I haven't read through this thread, I'd only like to react to the original post. Just yesterday a 109 jockey was whining in another thread about how Spitfires don't lose their energy and the FMs should be immediately corrected, and now here's a RAF jockey whining how the 109 never loses E.

This is so funny. While I agree that the current FMs need a lot of revision and far from being correct, these threads are nothing more than entertainment - such a typical thing in flight sims: you got shot down by a better pilot? Blame the FMs!
(I do it sometimes too )
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.