Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-12-2011, 06:09 AM
41Sqn_Banks 41Sqn_Banks is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 644
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JtD View Post
The Mk.Va came with a float type carburettor. The Tilly orifice would only have an effect when flying at 12lb boost and 3000 rpm, if you did not do that, it was pretty much meaningless. If you did, however, the engine would continue to work under negative g just fine.

To me it sounds as if combustions stops during the inverted flight and the engine spools back up thereafter, which indicates the behaviour to be typical for a Merlin with a standard float type carburettor.

On the other hand the engine spools up quite nicely (though on a very rich mixture) immediately after returning to positive g's, so maybe a fuel flow restrictor (i.e. Tilly orifice) was in place. The Merlin handbook states up to 10 seconds of recovery after a neg g situation, which clearly isn't there.
Which Merlin handbook are you referring to? Don't you mean Pilot's Notes General? Standard procedure for inverted flying was close the throttle to allow a smooth recovery.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-12-2011, 07:40 AM
JtD JtD is offline
Il-2 enthusiast & Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 903
Default

Not a plane handbook / pilot notes, but a Merlin document, which I can't seem to find at the moment. Sorry.

Good point about closing the throttle, slipped my mind and it would indeed limit the problem, but the fuel pump would still flood the engine to some extend.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-12-2011, 08:40 AM
41Sqn_Banks 41Sqn_Banks is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 644
Default

The throttle also had to be closed when negativ g cut out occured. IIRC Reason is that when the throttle remains opened and the fuel flow is restored the engine might overrev as power is regain so quickly that the CSP can't react quick enough.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-12-2011, 09:57 AM
ZaltysZ's Avatar
ZaltysZ ZaltysZ is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lithuania
Posts: 426
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 41Sqn_Banks View Post
The throttle also had to be closed when negativ g cut out occured. IIRC Reason is that when the throttle remains opened and the fuel flow is restored the engine might overrev as power is regain so quickly that the CSP can't react quick enough.
Engine starves briefly at first and then gets flooded with fuel, because things get reversed: the more fuel you have in float chamber, the more fuel you get into it. Tilly orifice simply restricted fuel flow to amount engine needs at max power setting, so even when things are reversed, float chamber gets no more fuel than engine can burn (at max power setting). Lower the fuel usage (cut the throttle or lower the RPM), and Tilly orifice won't prevent the flooding anymore. Without orifice things are the same, except engine gets flooded even at max power setting.

Running engine at max RPM and open throttle softens the flooding by some extent, but recovering with same settings can indeed result in overrev. It is probably better to cut the throttle just before recovery and not the moment cut out occurs - this seems more optimal.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-12-2011, 11:47 AM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Quote:
Did you watch the video? I was referring to the video.
Rolling upside down is not a negative G maneuver, it is positive G. I do it sometimes the time in my plane.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-12-2011, 01:13 PM
JtD JtD is offline
Il-2 enthusiast & Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 903
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
Rolling upside down is not a negative G maneuver, it is positive G. I do it sometimes the time in my plane.


Watch the video.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-12-2011, 08:46 PM
Osprey's Avatar
Osprey Osprey is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gloucestershire, England
Posts: 1,264
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
Rolling upside down is not a negative G maneuver, it is positive G. I do it sometimes the time in my plane.
You didn't watch the video. It's not a roll, it's an inverted flypast. I don't see the prop windmill but regardless if I did this move in game it would most certainly cut out completely.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-12-2011, 09:30 PM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Quote:
It's not a roll, it's an inverted flypast.
It is definately NOT a float carburetor then.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-12-2011, 10:05 PM
klem's Avatar
klem klem is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Osprey View Post
You didn't watch the video. It's not a roll, it's an inverted flypast. I don't see the prop windmill but regardless if I did this move in game it would most certainly cut out completely.
Its more a case of listening to the engine. It cuts to occasional firing.
__________________
klem
56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds"
http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/



ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU
Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-12-2011, 01:08 PM
JtD JtD is offline
Il-2 enthusiast & Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 903
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZaltysZ View Post
Engine starves briefly at first and then gets flooded with fuel, because things get reversed: the more fuel you have in float chamber, the more fuel you get into it. Tilly orifice simply restricted fuel flow to amount engine needs at max power setting, so even when things are reversed, float chamber gets no more fuel than engine can burn (at max power setting). Lower the fuel usage (cut the throttle or lower the RPM), and Tilly orifice won't prevent the flooding anymore. Without orifice things are the same, except engine gets flooded even at max power setting.

Running engine at max RPM and open throttle softens the flooding by some extent, but recovering with same settings can indeed result in overrev. It is probably better to cut the throttle just before recovery and not the moment cut out occurs - this seems more optimal.
Yes but...

if you cut throttle there's less air flow to suck the fuel out of the jet nozzle, so the engine does not get flooded as much. It's true what he said, it was recommended to cut throttle during neg g manoeuvres, in order to get the engine "get going earlier".

Throttle also had to be reduced and was not to be applied quickly due to low oil pressure in (longer) neg g manoeuvres.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.