Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-12-2011, 12:40 AM
CWMV's Avatar
CWMV CWMV is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 758
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Schlageter View Post
Auszüge aus Flugzeugdatenblatt Bf 109 E-1, E-3 nach L.Dv.556/3
http://www.rolfwolf.de/daten/E4/Emil.html

Official documentation for production 109Es is trash. Right, got you.

1.) V0 = 467 km/h
2.) V0 = 467 km/h Werte graphisch
3.) V0 = 467 km/h auf 0 m bezogen!
4.) V0 = 466 km/h

http://www.kurfurst.org/Performance_...MP16feb39.html

Strange that you would ignore other data on Barbi's site.
Far from ignored, just not relevant. That info does nothing more than prove that the difference between cannon and mg wing guns is negligible, and that the max speed at 1.3 ata is around 470kph.
So what is it at 1.35, or even better the MAX speed using the 1.42 emergency setting...Ill bet its closer to 490, unless you believe that the max speed wouldn't change with more power.
We are talking about MAX speed, right?

But I find your attitude even stranger.
See, this is the part of this site that I thought we were going to avoid in this thread. You act like you've got a dog in this fight, when were doing nothing more than comparing notes.
IvanK got on here and posted the same info, and more of it, but wasn't a snide little troll when he did it. In that way he came off as a professional and someone worth listening to.
You, not so much. I'm sorry to see that civil discussion is something you have not mastered.

And hypocritical to boot, you would chide me for ignoring information that you (erroneously) believe supports your point, while dismissing what I bring to the fore.

Now, perhaps we can continue this discussion in less derisive manner?

Id also like to add that I am amazed that with this exception the discussion here has been as informative and civil as it has been, lets hope it catches on around here!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by banned View Post
Just fix the friggin thing you boof heads. It's getting boring now. Only 11 people on the whole thing. Yawn.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-12-2011, 10:19 AM
VO101_Tom's Avatar
VO101_Tom VO101_Tom is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 799
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CWMV View Post
So what is it at 1.35, or even better the MAX speed using the 1.42 emergency setting...Ill bet its closer to 490, unless you believe that the max speed wouldn't change with more power.
We are talking about MAX speed, right?
Exactly. The notleistung 20% extra power would not cause any acceleration (only up to 10 km/h)? Nonsense.


source: www.enginehistory.com
__________________
| AFBs of CloD 2[/URL] |www.pumaszallas.hu

i7 7700K 4.8GHz, 32GB Ram 3GHz, MSI GTX 1070 8GB, 27' 1920x1080, W10/64, TrackIR 4Pro, G940
Cliffs of Dover Bugtracker site: share and vote issues here
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.