Why does luthier even bother?

[ParaB]

Originally Posted by JG52Krupi

Its pretty damn good, certainly a step beyond rof.

I'd disagree. While the recent changes to the colours/lighting have indeed improved the visuals in CloD I still think RoF looks a lot better. One of my biggest problems is that South England in CloD simply doesn't look like South England while RoF's terrain does IMO an excellent job of recreating the looks of 1914-18 north-west France.

IMHO the composition of textures, lighting and 3d objects provides a much more pleasant result than CloD. Oh, and RoF has working FSAA...

Of course, your mileage may vary.

[Trooper117]

C'mon guys, lets not start bashing other games.. I have Rof, IL2 1946, CoD, FSX and others, and they are all great in their own way..

[JG52Krupi]

Originally Posted by Trooper117

C'mon guys, lets not start bashing other games.. I have Rof, IL2 1946, CoD, FSX and others, and they are all great in their own way..

I'm not bashing I love rof but the multiplayer left me wanting more, there are a number of things that rof do not model and il2 already does... I will continue to support both games.

[Trooper117]

Originally Posted by JG52Krupi

I'm not bashing I love rof but the multiplayer left me wanting more, there are a number of things that rof do not model and il2 already does... I will continue to support both games.

Yes mate.. me too!

[MD_Titus]

Luthier bothers with the forum as he is obviously a masochist. That or his self-esteem is so mighty he feels the need to be brought back down a bit so comes here for a read.

Oh and ROF was pony in it's first 6 months of life. Good now, but i've not touched it since the implementatuon of field mods - don't like being gouged for money, especially after spending in excess of £100 in 18 months.

[SYN_Repent]

krupi, check back a few pages, ace of aces was asking what was advertised what we havent got, the ground breaking 3d engine was advertised on two websites, the clod official, and ubisoft, you admitted yourself then that we aint got whats advertised in that respect and that its not ground breaking.

why do you keep bringing up RoF? why do you think im comparing ground models in clod to RoF, ive not mentioned that once, never have i said RoF models are superior either in number or quality, your just making that bs up....

lol, lmao, douche......its just a forum dude

[Trooper117]

I cannot believe the use of the language I've been seeing on these forums is beneficial to anyone.
Its the kind of foul mouthed jargon that I use when I'm with my platoon, grown men in a grown up enviroment with no kids present, and yes, children visit this forum.
Lets cut it out gents.

[JG52Krupi]

Originally Posted by ParaB

I'd disagree. While the recent changes to the colours/lighting have indeed improved the visuals in CloD I still think RoF looks a lot better. One of my biggest problems is that South England in CloD simply doesn't look like South England while RoF's terrain does IMO an excellent job of recreating the looks of 1914-18 north-west France.

IMHO the composition of textures, lighting and 3d objects provides a much more pleasant result than CloD. Oh, and RoF has working FSAA...

Of course, your mileage may vary.

Nice pic.

You will see, once we have FSAA the lighting and weather sorted then we can compare pics until then compare pics with no weather.