Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Pilot's Lounge

Pilot's Lounge Members meetup

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-11-2011, 08:31 AM
RAF_Nudge RAF_Nudge is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vengeanze View Post
Releasing a beta that locks the game at first explosion????!!!?!?!
How does that give you confidence in their competence?
How could it slip through?
If they knew about it then perhaps communicate that to us - their unpaid beta testers.
Sorry if anyone disagrees with me...actually no I'm not...

But for most I think they expect far TOO MUCH from thier systems!
I am using above the recomended specs on a dedicated gaming rig and by no means is it top notch either. My game runs fine on full settings, but maybe I'm one of the lucky ones? I don't know..My specs are at the bottom of post.


MY POINT HERE IS:
To post as much detail including your crash dump files and system specs as well as your current graphics drivers and even sound drivers etc for the developers to look over and allow them to determine what the issues are....and thus move foward with beta to an official release sooner rather than later..

I myself have had the installer stop working and drop out of game forcing a game restart but have not got any crash dumps at this stage. Folder is empty?

MY SYSTEM
CPU Phenom II X4 965 @ 3.4 Ghz (Quad Core)
MB Gygabyte GA-78LMT-S2P
GPU Gigabyte 1gb GTX550 ti Nvidea Drive Ver 280.26
RAM G.Skill 8gb DDR3 1333mhz
OS Win 7 Home Premium 64Bit OEM
PSU A-Power M80 Plus 550W 80+ Certified
CASE Antec 300 gaming tower with twin 140mm fans 1x inlet 1x exhaust
MONITOR Acer 21.5" V223HQBD 5ms Monitor
HDD WD 3.5" 500gb Blue Sata 3 7200rpm
JOYSTICK Saitek Cyborg evo
Attached Images
File Type: jpg CloD Video Options.jpg (271.4 KB, 8 views)
File Type: jpg NVIDIA SETTINGS 1.jpg (125.8 KB, 7 views)
File Type: jpg NVIDIA SETTINGS 2.jpg (225.8 KB, 6 views)
  #2  
Old 10-11-2011, 08:50 AM
SYN_Repent SYN_Repent is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 97
Default

your game runs "fine" nudge?? im sorry but i think your perception of fine and everyone else's must be out of whack, as looking at your screenshots there, the cpu and gfx card you have, there is no way the game would run "fine" on high settings, especially the settings your using, christ, if its true then we all need to build your system.

fine for me is 60 fps, locked at my vsync, what fps are you getting to state a fine performance??
  #3  
Old 10-06-2011, 05:59 AM
RCAF_FB_Orville RCAF_FB_Orville is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
Posts: 341
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
I have to wonder what part of 'beta' do these people not understand?

I mean the download clearly says 'beta' in the title.. right?

So I don't think they can say they didn't realize it is a 'beta' patch.. But than again their are people in their 30s trying to sue cigarette companies claiming they didn't realize smoking was bad.. Even though cigarette packages have had warning labels for over 30 years.. So I guess I am not surprised that a few people try to..

I guess I just never realized there were 'so many' of these 'few' types of people.

Here luthier gives us a beta patch to 'test'.. Yet these people act shocked that there is a bug in a beta patch? To the point that some are having a total break down hissy fit and saying they give up..

@ luthier.. I know you meant well..

And I know you thought you might be able to receive some useful feedback by releasing this beta patch to the masses.. The idea being more people beta testings means you will be able to find and fix bugs sooner..

And I know you even went as far as to say in your first post, i.e.



Yet they act as if you said nothing at all.. based on the majority of the responses thus far..

I think you might be better off sticking to the way you have done it in the past.. Just release the beta patch to your smaller select group of testers..

Oh sure that means it will take longer to find bugs because there are less people beta testing..

But when you consider that 'most' of the 'masses' are not even willing to make use of a work around (turn effects to low) to continue beta testing..

You got to ask yourself is it worth the trouble?

Clearly 'most' of the 'masses' here have no idea of what beta means and the purpose behind releasing a beta patch
Maybe the question should be 'why do we even bother'? Of what value is a beta patch in terms of information gathering when it locks up the sim within seconds (not related to explosions) and one has to kill it with Task Manager....generating no crash dump files whatsoever? It is unplayable, with far worse FPS and no I won't turn down one of the few things that make it enjoyable. Whose fault is that? Ours? FYI, we essentially 'agreed' (for 'agreed' read 'were duped') to being Alpha testers when we bought this, not to mention being conned into buying something that bears no resemblance to what CoD actually is. Most here have done their fair share of testing, (and shown quite remarkable patience). That wasn't the deal....if you remember.

Half a year on, still the 'one step forwards, two back' dance. FYI I have made a truckload of bug reports and tried to help, but it feels like trying to help a CRACKHEAD who pockets the money you gave him for food and clothes and returns to the demon glass pipe.

It's a p*ss take of Biblical proportion and most people have little enough free time to enjoy themselves as it is. I already have a job, don't need need two. CoD at times is work. I am not a 1c employee, and while I will try to help (and certainly have done) within reason, getting things sorted is in fact their job. Capische?

Cheers.
  #4  
Old 10-06-2011, 07:17 AM
Vengeanze Vengeanze is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 837
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RCAF_FB_Orville View Post
Maybe the question should be 'why do we even bother'? Of what value is a beta patch in terms of information gathering when it locks up the sim within seconds (not related to explosions) and one has to kill it with Task Manager....generating no crash dump files whatsoever? It is unplayable, with far worse FPS and no I won't turn down one of the few things that make it enjoyable. Whose fault is that? Ours? FYI, we essentially 'agreed' (for 'agreed' read 'were duped') to being Alpha testers when we bought this, not to mention being conned into buying something that bears no resemblance to what CoD actually is. Most here have done their fair share of testing, (and shown quite remarkable patience). That wasn't the deal....if you remember.

Half a year on, still the 'one step forwards, two back' dance. FYI I have made a truckload of bug reports and tried to help, but it feels like trying to help a CRACKHEAD who pockets the money you gave him for food and clothes and returns to the demon glass pipe.

It's a p*ss take of Biblical proportion and most people have little enough free time to enjoy themselves as it is. I already have a job, don't need need two. CoD at times is work. I am not a 1c employee, and while I will try to help (and certainly have done) within reason, getting things sorted is in fact their job. Capische?

Cheers.
Well put Orville. I've spent more time testing and tweaking this game than actually enjoying it.
It's more than obvious that 1C do not have their own testers and that they rely on us to do their work. I wouldn't mind being a beta tester but alpha? Nah.
I'm not sure I like this new process where the customers/clients are the alpha testers. Make a parallell with buying a car or any other product if you will.

- "Great. Now the turn indicators work but they're inverted (handle down=right indicator and vv). I love the new iPhone gadget you introduced but now the brakes don't work anymore."

I suggest 1C asks the community for beta testers and pick out 300 or so for a closed beta. Then sets up a closed beta server and give the testers a t-shirt and a mug or something and mention them in the "thank you" text in the game.
  #5  
Old 10-06-2011, 08:14 AM
addman's Avatar
addman addman is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vasa, Finland
Posts: 1,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vengeanze View Post
Well put Orville. I've spent more time testing and tweaking this game than actually enjoying it.
It's more than obvious that 1C do not have their own testers and that they rely on us to do their work. I wouldn't mind being a beta tester but alpha? Nah.
I'm not sure I like this new process where the customers/clients are the alpha testers. Make a parallell with buying a car or any other product if you will.

- "Great. Now the turn indicators work but they're inverted (handle down=right indicator and vv). I love the new iPhone gadget you introduced but now the brakes don't work anymore."

I suggest 1C asks the community for beta testers and pick out 300 or so for a closed beta. Then sets up a closed beta server and give the testers a t-shirt and a mug or something and mention them in the "thank you" text in the game.
Have to agree a bit here. The purpose of a patch (correct me if I'm wrong here), be it alpha, beta or whatever is to improve upon earlier release, not make it worse. Stop saying "luthier don't bother, those ingrates don't understand you like we do" because every single person on this forum appreciate the work they do BUT their work leaves us dumbfounded over and over again. 1 step forward, 2 steps back etc.

Also, try to get it in your heads that Luthier isn't releasing patches, he's trying to finish the game! At this pace this game shouldn't have been released before Q4 2012. Of course we moaned and wanted it released ASAP, who wouldn't have wanted it released?! That wasn't the reason they released it though, it was some other reason, most likely lack of dollar reasons.

Anywho, don't point fingers at the community, we are IL-2! Fact is, we are playing an alpha stage game on it's way into beta.
__________________

Last edited by addman; 10-06-2011 at 08:22 AM.
  #6  
Old 10-06-2011, 08:29 AM
Tree_UK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Really, I think Luthier shouldn't bother anymore, its clear this project is well over the heads of the DEv's, give the game to the community, let the real pro's fix it like they did Il2.
  #7  
Old 10-06-2011, 08:39 AM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,128
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK View Post
Really, I think Luthier shouldn't bother anymore, its clear this project is well over the heads of the DEv's, give the game to the community, let the real pro's fix it like they did Il2.
Lmao what a load of bs.... Ahahah.

For me the game is running quite well, obviously you can't test it fully until they remove the crash bug.

Tree stop throwing your toys out of the pram.. It's a beta and luthier specifically stated that some system were experiencing problems... I could agree with your toy throwing if this was a proper patch but this is a BETA we are meant to test it.

That said from what I have seen cockpits over saturated and land is back to being too pastel coloured.
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL.
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.
  #8  
Old 10-06-2011, 08:45 AM
Flanker35M Flanker35M is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,806
Default

S!

Well, Luthier and his team were given a pile of unfinished code done over 6 years, restarted and whatever. I do not envy his task of finishing this product. So this is what we got for now and until Luthier's team get their work done we just have to test and wait.
But fact still is that the game is far from being even remotely ready. Potential, a step to right direction or a beta patch is NOT same as beign ready.
I already shelved the game and went to other games like World Of Tanks, A-10C Warthog etc. and just check the progress of CoD now and then. Maybe in a year or so it is mature enough to actually be what it should have been from the start. Really, I wish the Cod Would be ready and a shining start, but now..choose yourself.
  #9  
Old 10-06-2011, 01:27 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

@ NedLynch.. @ capt vertigo.. @ mazex.. @ CWMV... @ Flanker35M.. @ Topo.. @ Whiski

Thank you guys for the feedback and letting me know that there are some reasonable people in this forum! People with a realistic view of the world..

You have restored some of my confidence that there are some 'adults' mixed in with the 'masses' S!

@ Vengeanzw.. @ RCAF_FB_Orville.. @ Tvrdi.. @ Tree_UK.. @ Dutch 851

None of your post were worth quoting.. Best to treat them like I would treat a kid in a store who pointing at something on the shelf with his/her eyes full of tears and screaming 'I want I want I want'

Basically ignore them and keep walking.

But I do want to thank you for proving just how spot on my original post is!

I do have to give a special shout out to addman.. Though his post was not as temper tantrum filled as the ones above..

I want to quote something he said that proves that you and yours have no concept of what the word beta means, i.e.

Quote:
Originally Posted by addman View Post
The purpose of a patch (correct me if I'm wrong here), be it alpha, beta or whatever is to improve upon earlier release, not make it worse.
As I said.. no idea what 'beta' means in that he clearly has 'patch' confused with 'beta patch' and 'beta testing'
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.

Last edited by ACE-OF-ACES; 10-06-2011 at 01:31 PM.
  #10  
Old 10-06-2011, 01:34 PM
Tvrdi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
@ NedLynch.. @ capt vertigo.. @ mazex.. @ CWMV... @ Flanker35M.. @ Topo.. @ Whiski

Thank you guys for the feedback and letting me know that there are some reasonable people in this forum! People with a realistic view of the world..

You have restored some of my confidence that there are some 'adults' mixed in with the 'masses' S!

@ Vengeanzw.. @ RCAF_FB_Orville.. @ Tvrdi.. @ Tree_UK.. @ Dutch 851

None of your post were worth quoting.. Best to treat them like I would treat a kid in a store who pointing at something on the shelf with his/her eyes full of tears and screaming 'I want I want I want'

Basically ignore them and keep walking.

But I do want to thank you for proving just how spot on my original post is!

I do have to give a special shout out to addman.. Though his post was not as temper tantrum filled as the ones above..

I want to quote something he said that proves that you and yours have no concept of what the word beta means, i.e.



As I said.. no idea what 'beta' means in that he clearly has 'patch' confused with 'beta patch' and 'beta testing'
Your talking about apples and we are talking about oranges. Your lost dude in your defender of the crown crusade. I never whined. Just said the truth. Btw Im enjoying this game now although there still many bugs and a room for optimisation (with pretty strong machine I still need to tone down some settings to have a decent performance).
cheers

Last edited by Tvrdi; 10-06-2011 at 01:38 PM.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.