Merlin negative G cutout too quick?

[IvanK]

Originally Posted by TomcatViP

"Meeeep Mep MeeepMeeep " here in the country of thundering Renault engines (excluding F1 obviously)

Regarding the cut out and turbulences : more consumption -> more flow -> higher capacity fuel pumps -> more fuel momentum -> less probability of a cutout from turbulences only

It seems as if some of us wld hve to compute the exact flow rates of the eng pump to end this debate

But definitively Crumpp is right for the Lynco.

Ok some Maths for the Boffins. Knock yourselves out guys Here are the Maths used in the design of the first attempt at the Negative G solution. The Source is the First document I referred to in previous posts. Note Its Merlin XX data.