![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Do you expect anyone to make planes overnight? It's not easy.
You keep complaining that the Italian forces are under-represented. Just in case you haven't noticed, we've gotten an SM.79, Re.2000, Re.2002, CANT Z.1007, Fiat G.55s of many variations and the G.50 model was corrected. The new patch will feature new default skin variations that will permit the user to change the skin of the Ju-87, Ju-88 etc to a Mediterranean one simply by switching the nationality. A few other surprises may be in store as well. Think about how many planes that is in just two patches. Still want to complain? |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Xilon if you want all this stuff you keep asking for then feel free to make it yourself.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I thank all the teams Daidalos for SM.79, Re.2000, Re.2002, CANT Z.1007, Fiat G.55s of many variations and the G.50 model was corrected.
BUT the work not is copletely complete missing much much italian airplane and bombers IMAM ro 43/44 missing piaggio p108 and missing fiat br20 missing reggiane 2006 missing CANT 1018 missing S.M.81 and 82 missing the DORNIER 217 iTALIAN HAVE THIS FOR BOMBER missing cant 501 cant 506 ecc. but war ship pola, trento bolzano class littorio giulio cesare, roma ,cavour,zara,fiume,ecc.ecc. and italian tank and trqansport unit missing for colum. the work for daidalos team is hard and longe but for me is sufficent add only 2 important bombers italian example and 1 italian seaplane. 1important war ship and 1 importat cruiser 1 important tank stop. Last edited by Xilon_x; 09-22-2011 at 08:09 AM. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ok, but think about how many planes are missing from all the other air forces too! In a world of finite resources, you can't have everything, unfortunately.
I'd love to have those planes too, but since neither of us can model, we have to take what we get, and be happy that we have anything at all! This is a request thread. It's ok to make requests. But, remember not to turn your request for something into a complaint for lack of that something. Have patience, and maybe you'll be pleasantly surprised! Last edited by Romanator21; 09-22-2011 at 08:35 AM. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
There are many generic skins that change with the theater of war, which can't be selected manually.
It would be nice to have each generic skin as a bmp in your skin folder so you can choose for instance a western europe p47 generic skin in a pacific theater map. Or winter cammo in a summer map. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Each new plane is welcome.
But I think it would be possible to have more planes easily whitout heavy modifications, by using the existing in game aircrafts in order to dispose many of missing variants. Some examples: GE: Me109 E1 & E3, Me110 D, E & F, Fw190 A2,A3,F9 GB: Hurricane mk IIa & Sea Hurricanes, Spitfire/Seafire mk I & II, Blenheim's fighter variant & IV-V (with improved defensive armament), Beaufighter Mk I & VI. US: P40's F-K-L-N, P38's E-F-G-H, F4U1 Birdcage & F4U4, SBD's 2-4-6, B-25 C (field mod) & J strafer variant, A20 strafer (field mod). USSR: A20 (field mod with UB machine guns and UTK rear turret) And the list is far from being closed. Sorry for my bad English. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have a small request. There are many times when I would like to fly as a pilot or bombardier, but not both, in single player. I find it tedious to have to fly the aircraft, aim the bombsight and worry about fighters at the same time.
I think it would be realistic to allow the aircraft to be flown by AI (autopilot), and still have manual control of the bombsight and bomb release. And on the flipside, it would be nice to have an AI fellow as your bombardier so I could concentrate on flying. Any thoughts? |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Adding new variants of new planes, and increasing the loadout options for existing planes would make a lot of mods redundant. It would also be relatively quick and easy to do, since little new 3d modeling, FM and DM work would be needed. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
P-51A (as flown by the Air Commandos in Burma) and P-47N comes to my mind
Quote:
By the way, am I the only one who thinks that the ground is way too rough? It's nearly impossible to taxi around outside runways without nosing over. It's unrealistic, since forward airfields were usually just open stretches of land and aircraft were able to operate from them. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|