water cannon

[Sternjaeger II]

Originally Posted by MD_Titus

so, that'd basically be someone who likes owning guns, wants to own guns and sees no reason why others shouldn't be allowed to do so.

essentially, someone who would agree with you without question.

and still you continue with the video games as justification. it is simply not a valid comparison.

your statement clearly shows you're not reading what I write, or that my English is not good enough, or that you don't understand your own language. Read my posts again and please give me a valid reason why people licensed from the institution couldn't own semiauto full bore firearms and pistols.

you're damn right this is something that won't be agreed upon, especially as your definition of "agree" is "own a gun, join a club and go target shooting".

no, my definition of agree is respecting the fact that some people can own certain firearms and that you don't have to fear from them, since they won't jump on you and shoot your head off. It sounds like you think that every gun owner is a nutter!!

winny - much like power then - those that seek it should be kept as far from it as possible.

Ok, according to the theory of both of you, if I seek something cos I like it I should be kept away from it?!

You two sound like the envious losers who slag people who own fast cars just because they can't afford it..

Talking of which, here's another comparison: say that I like fast cars, which have a serious potential of infringing the law because of their speed, and that we could well do without, since you can have a normal car for your commuting. Shall we forbid fast cars just cos they serve no purpose? Or shall we be free to own something that yes, potentially it can be used to infringe the law and even kill someone, but still it's our own personal free choice to spend our own money?