![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Bandit Bill, good call m8! |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
While I don't know who Daichidicki is; I have to mention that the post about his being banned is mis-quoted. He wasn't banned for using the "aimbot" but rather for flying a Lerche (which he posted tracks to here in this forum under the nik Santa Clause) that was not a part of the planeset for that server (again something shown in the tracks he posted).
While the tracks clearly show that he knows how to cheat (which was the point of the post) most of his posts seem to support the anti-mod crowd. Just my take on things. wg |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keep in mind other catagories that seem to be overlooked.
For some, there is a huge difference between a mod and a cheat. Someone could be "anti-mod", "pro-mod", "anti-cheat" or "pro-mod-anti-cheat". There are also some that are just "pro-cheat" ![]() Some catagories can find common ground, while others will not. Last edited by Daichidicki; 01-04-2008 at 06:08 AM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
was his post inconvenient for you ? Last edited by zapatista; 01-04-2008 at 12:35 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A better question would be is it inconvenient for you to find an actual cheater then point to an anti-modder who is cheating and using the same tools he attacks to try to prove that cheating exists?
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Well if you want to get personal:Yes I have contributed to that site,me and several others.Maybe even you,as you are a member of that forum,just under another name.I have nothing to hide.So zapatista,it looks like you actually support known cheaters now? A known cheater will never have my support,yet you seem to support him.Strange.And you seem to know more about cheating than most of us here,so maybe you have another agenda?
Proof of cheating is not inconvenient to me,in fact it is what I asked for at the beginning of this thread.Everyone was saying how the game was ruined,they had all got proof of cheating online,and the sky was falling.Yet when I had the temerity to ask people to post the proof they all had so we could all see the scope of the cheating we had various answers ranging from 'oh you can't actually see it' to 'well I have proof on my hard drive but I am not going to post it here!' Last edited by JG52Uther; 01-04-2008 at 02:24 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
@Jg52Uther
the cheater you´ve mentioned had the callsign daichdiki, the poster here in this thread calls himself daichidicki. That is not the same and maybe you are wrong in calling him a pro-cheater, especially as his posts are anti - hacking.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects ![]() |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
1) this thread's specific purpose is to demonstrate how easy it is to cheat with the new hacks, because the hack kiddies themselves claim it is impossible and all they want to do is paint flowers on their 109's and sing kumbaya 2) a person named Daichidicki makes several anti-hack posts in this thread 3) a few screen shot are posted with somebody using a nick similar to Daichi which simply show proof how easy it is to fly restricted planes on full real servers (ie checksum 2 doesnt prevent it) and now wait for it .......... 4) uther who directly financially pays the hackers to support them, and promotes here openly that stealing from oleg and vandalizing his property is ok, now suddenly this same uther says that Daichidicki shouldnt post here no free prizes for detecting the irrational step in the argument |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|