FPS COMPARISON 1.02.14821 vs 1.03.15527 @ 09-08-2011

[SPUDLEY1977]

Baron von Pizza (I'm hungary), I am not familiar with that, what specificially is it supposed to test, memory bandwith? and which one as there are several memory bandwith potential bottlenecks on a PC....Mobo<>CPU, MOBO >< GPU, RAM bandwidth, and like others that I am not versed in.

Damn Im hungry and it is 1600 hours Fri AM and I cannot sleep so Im browsing,.... make mine extra sauce, pepperoni, veggies, and Jalapenos please.

[baronWastelan]

The test utility runs on your CPU to calculate the maximum theoretical throughput of your system RAM. The results are determined by your memory sub-system hardware and how it is configured. It does not test graphics card. Bigger numbers are better for bandwidth, smaller number is better for latency. I provided my results so you can compare yours since you have a similar system, i.e. LGA775 socket quad-core processor and 4 GB RAM.

[SPUDLEY1977]

Baroni,
Thanks but I am all tested out, don't have the software and do not feel the need to this test aspect. I was only providing info for others to assismilate and use for good purpose.

[SsSsSsSsSnake]

Mazex same system specs as you and since upgrading to those runs really nice,

[mazex]

Originally Posted by SsSsSsSsSnake

Mazex same system specs as you and since upgrading to those runs really nice,

I agree, I really don't have any performance issues in CoD. Occasionally it can have some stuttering when something goes boom or some loading occurs - but that can happen in other games too. Even though it feels like it will be possible to get higher fps when the game is optimized it's really OK now on my rig at least. Around 50-70 normally in a battle at low altitude running on "high" settings... I think I get about the same fps in RoF which has a less ground details and objects.