![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
errr. and that is important because of....???
Regarding these things I would trust an aviation engineer rather than an historian any day LOL clown... makes me giggle happy new year to u too |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
DerAlte P.S. As he is a aviation engineer, I wonder why there are so many planes are inaccurate? Starting with loadouts, to CG when fuel tanks are emptied. Maybe he should have asked a historian about the planes, then the Corsair I would be in the game as a F4U-1. The Corsair I was used as a training plane, never seen combat under the FAA flag. Don't get me wrong, at this point in time this series is the best on the market. He really needs to be more carefull with the next series. It takes more than a engineer to make a accurate and fun aviation sim. Last edited by DerAlte; 01-01-2008 at 02:31 PM. Reason: none, really |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
It amazes me how people constantly forget a few things when discussing stuff like this about this sim.
1-This sim is built on an engine that is what.... 10 years old? If I am not mistaken I believe this engine started out as a space sim.... 2-This engine in it's current form is 7 years old.. 3-There are over 200 flyable aircraft in this sim of various sizes & specs, each one flies a bit different. 4-I challenge any of you to find a better WWII combat sim on thre market.. or one that models FMs better than this one. Warts and all.. there isn't one. I tried the 1% planes from CFS, when I could get that POS to work on my PC with my FFB joystick... and IMO it is not close. Personally although there are issues with this sim I would still rather see the FMs either totally locked or decided by one source... rather than a hodgepodge of diffeeing FMs for differing planes based on what people think is right. But hey.. thats me. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bear::
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
+1
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
If it was only the soundmod (sounds) i wouldnt have any problems with this situation whatsoever. If it was done in a way where the code didnt have to be illigaly cracked i wouldnt have any problems with it.
Sadly this brings along a bunch of other bs that are totaly unexepteble. Everybody knows that the new mods are done by people based on a feeling on how it should be. So maby the Italian guns are way to weak, but the modder has no way of knowing how it really should be...if they are infact to weak to begin with, who knows? As for 6Dof? Well, 4Dof or 6Dof makes no differanse to me, anybody can bye a Trackir (As long as it works like Leitmotiv says, no gaping holes and such) Its all the other crap that makes cheating to easy that irretates me. The cheats that pretty much cant be detected even if u had a track of the offender. Sound in the end doesnt hurt anybody in that sence, same with 6Dof...kind of like improving what we allredy have ingame. Personally though, i still have a problem with the starter of all this (sound) was done illigaly against Olegs wishes. (or maby sounds where done after BECAUSE the code was cracked, i dont know really. ) Last edited by Baron; 01-01-2008 at 06:43 PM. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am a little weary of the constant refrain that the mods have zotzed the sim forever for online. How can the the people who enjoy "Med Air War" and "Over Flanders Fields" play online if their massively modded items can't exclude non-regulation mods from servers? As I understand from the MAW forum, anybody trying to play with unofficial mods on their MAW program gets automatically plinked by the server, and they warn people to keep their personal copies of MAW with their own fixes separate from their online version. I am getting the impression the onliners are simply taking their marbles out of the game because they lost on the mod matter. Oleg left so many things undone which were not difficult fixes (as we now know): mirror for the frasting Hellcat, getting rid of the obnoxious nav lights on the AI so that night air battles can occur, 6 DOF (the doing of which proved possible despite countless official claims to the contrary), and on and on. I cannot help but wonder if Oleg was conducting a Darwinian intelligence test: are you going to be a dunce and passively accept you will never have what this sim needs, or are you going to pass the intelligence test and fix the sim yourself? I find his silence on the matter fascinating.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
In response to there new post..>> http://allaircraftarcade.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1946
I replied and was ban "Great job ... The sad thing is most all(NOT ALL) of you are arcade flying noobs. You don't know better. This isn't counter strike, or half life, or rainbow 6 they all are for 11 year old kids now due to mod fools support. Are you trying for improving on the Sim? Or to feed your ego and make $ ... by letting the cat out of the bag. you have opened Pandora's box....... You have trashed this Sim ." I got ban for that.. Censorship again Last edited by RaVe; 01-01-2008 at 07:17 PM. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Ratsack |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
You might see the odd fm/dm/wm cheat,but there could potentially be huge numbers using the 6dof mod.As well as fm/dm/wm mods, its the one major mod I will not go near for online flying,yet its the one mod that quite a few 'anti modders' seem to like! Last edited by JG52Uther; 01-01-2008 at 10:59 PM. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|