Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-01-2008, 02:10 PM
F19_Klunk's Avatar
F19_Klunk F19_Klunk is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 236
Default

errr. and that is important because of....???

Regarding these things I would trust an aviation engineer rather than an historian any day LOL

clown... makes me giggle

happy new year to u too
__________________
C'thulhu's my wingman
F19 Virtual Squadron, The Squadron that gave you the J8A
  #2  
Old 01-01-2008, 02:17 PM
DerAlte DerAlte is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Good Old Germany
Posts: 47
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by F19_Klunk View Post
errr. and that is important because of....???

Regarding these things I would trust an aviation engineer rather than an historian any day LOL

clown... makes me giggle

happy new year to u too
If you insist.

DerAlte

P.S. As he is a aviation engineer, I wonder why there are so many planes are inaccurate? Starting with loadouts, to CG when fuel tanks are emptied. Maybe he should have asked a historian about the planes, then the Corsair I would be in the game as a F4U-1. The Corsair I was used as a training plane, never seen combat under the FAA flag. Don't get me wrong, at this point in time this series is the best on the market. He really needs to be more carefull with the next series. It takes more than a engineer to make a accurate and fun aviation sim.

Last edited by DerAlte; 01-01-2008 at 02:31 PM. Reason: none, really
  #3  
Old 01-01-2008, 04:07 PM
Bearcat Bearcat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern Va. by way of Da Bronx
Posts: 992
Default

It amazes me how people constantly forget a few things when discussing stuff like this about this sim.

1-This sim is built on an engine that is what.... 10 years old? If I am not mistaken I believe this engine started out as a space sim....

2-This engine in it's current form is 7 years old..

3-There are over 200 flyable aircraft in this sim of various sizes & specs, each one flies a bit different.

4-I challenge any of you to find a better WWII combat sim on thre market.. or one that models FMs better than this one. Warts and all.. there isn't one. I tried the 1% planes from CFS, when I could get that POS to work on my PC with my FFB joystick... and IMO it is not close.

Personally although there are issues with this sim I would still rather see the FMs either totally locked or decided by one source... rather than a hodgepodge of diffeeing FMs for differing planes based on what people think is right. But hey.. thats me.
  #4  
Old 01-01-2008, 04:26 PM
LEXX LEXX is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ussia
Posts: 276
Default

Bear::
Quote:
If I am not mistaken I believe this engine started out as a space sim....
Wow!
  #5  
Old 01-01-2008, 05:50 PM
ElAurens's Avatar
ElAurens ElAurens is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Great Black Swamp of Ohio
Posts: 2,185
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bearcat View Post
Personally although there are issues with this sim I would still rather see the FMs either totally locked or decided by one source... rather than a hodgepodge of diffeeing FMs for differing planes based on what people think is right. But hey.. thats me.

+1
__________________


Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943.
~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov
  #6  
Old 01-01-2008, 06:35 PM
Baron Baron is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 705
Default

If it was only the soundmod (sounds) i wouldnt have any problems with this situation whatsoever. If it was done in a way where the code didnt have to be illigaly cracked i wouldnt have any problems with it.

Sadly this brings along a bunch of other bs that are totaly unexepteble. Everybody knows that the new mods are done by people based on a feeling on how it should be. So maby the Italian guns are way to weak, but the modder has no way of knowing how it really should be...if they are infact to weak to begin with, who knows?

As for 6Dof? Well, 4Dof or 6Dof makes no differanse to me, anybody can bye a Trackir (As long as it works like Leitmotiv says, no gaping holes and such)


Its all the other crap that makes cheating to easy that irretates me. The cheats that pretty much cant be detected even if u had a track of the offender.


Sound in the end doesnt hurt anybody in that sence, same with 6Dof...kind of like improving what we allredy have ingame.


Personally though, i still have a problem with the starter of all this (sound) was done illigaly against Olegs wishes. (or maby sounds where done after BECAUSE the code was cracked, i dont know really. )

Last edited by Baron; 01-01-2008 at 06:43 PM.
  #7  
Old 01-01-2008, 07:10 PM
X X is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23
Default

I am a little weary of the constant refrain that the mods have zotzed the sim forever for online. How can the the people who enjoy "Med Air War" and "Over Flanders Fields" play online if their massively modded items can't exclude non-regulation mods from servers? As I understand from the MAW forum, anybody trying to play with unofficial mods on their MAW program gets automatically plinked by the server, and they warn people to keep their personal copies of MAW with their own fixes separate from their online version. I am getting the impression the onliners are simply taking their marbles out of the game because they lost on the mod matter. Oleg left so many things undone which were not difficult fixes (as we now know): mirror for the frasting Hellcat, getting rid of the obnoxious nav lights on the AI so that night air battles can occur, 6 DOF (the doing of which proved possible despite countless official claims to the contrary), and on and on. I cannot help but wonder if Oleg was conducting a Darwinian intelligence test: are you going to be a dunce and passively accept you will never have what this sim needs, or are you going to pass the intelligence test and fix the sim yourself? I find his silence on the matter fascinating.
  #8  
Old 01-01-2008, 07:13 PM
RaVe RaVe is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cape Cod Ma North East Us coast
Posts: 45
Default 4.09 hacked AAA forum Censership in action

In response to there new post..>> http://allaircraftarcade.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1946

I replied and was ban

"Great job ...
The sad thing is most all(NOT ALL) of you are arcade flying noobs. You don't know better.



This isn't counter strike, or half life, or rainbow 6 they all are for 11 year old kids now due to mod fools support.

Are you trying for improving on the Sim? Or to feed your ego and make $ ...
by letting the cat out of the bag.
you have opened Pandora's box.......


You have trashed this Sim ."


I got ban for that.. Censorship again

Last edited by RaVe; 01-01-2008 at 07:17 PM.
  #9  
Old 01-01-2008, 11:35 PM
Ratsack Ratsack is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by X View Post
I am a little weary of the constant refrain that the mods have zotzed the sim forever for online. How can the the people who enjoy "Med Air War" and "Over Flanders Fields" play online if their massively modded items can't exclude non-regulation mods from servers? As I understand from the MAW forum, anybody trying to play with unofficial mods on their MAW program gets automatically plinked by the server, and they warn people to keep their personal copies of MAW with their own fixes separate from their online version. ...
Burn the witch !

Ratsack
  #10  
Old 01-01-2008, 07:52 PM
JG52Uther's Avatar
JG52Uther JG52Uther is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,358
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron View Post
If it was only the soundmod (sounds) i wouldnt have any problems with this situation whatsoever. If it was done in a way where the code didnt have to be illigaly cracked i wouldnt have any problems with it.

Sadly this brings along a bunch of other bs that are totaly unexepteble. Everybody knows that the new mods are done by people based on a feeling on how it should be. So maby the Italian guns are way to weak, but the modder has no way of knowing how it really should be...if they are infact to weak to begin with, who knows?

As for 6Dof? Well, 4Dof or 6Dof makes no differanse to me, anybody can bye a Trackir (As long as it works like Leitmotiv says, no gaping holes and such)


Its all the other crap that makes cheating to easy that irretates me. The cheats that pretty much cant be detected even if u had a track of the offender.


Sound in the end doesnt hurt anybody in that sence, same with 6Dof...kind of like improving what we allredy have ingame.


Personally though, i still have a problem with the starter of all this (sound) was done illigaly against Olegs wishes. (or maby sounds where done after BECAUSE the code was cracked, i dont know really. )
Funny really,I consider the 6dof mod as just about the biggest cheat out there,for closed pit servers.And the one mod you are most likely to run in to online (over 30,000 views on that mod!)
You might see the odd fm/dm/wm cheat,but there could potentially be huge numbers using the 6dof mod.As well as fm/dm/wm mods, its the one major mod I will not go near for online flying,yet its the one mod that quite a few 'anti modders' seem to like!

Last edited by JG52Uther; 01-01-2008 at 10:59 PM.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.