Cliffs of Dover Steam Download Upate

[LoBiSoMeM]

[QUOTE=icarus;330243Anyway, all this attention to a 20 mb update is moot. It didn't do much and the big kahuna is Monday which will make this discussion irrelevant.

Monday will be fun




+1[/QUOTE]

Well... look: http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...00&postcount=1

Sounda out, left 190MB. And in these 190, we have one new MP map, some trains, etc.

Do the math.

Well, all this is about people that want "proof" of performance increase. Well, I'm not in a court of law, I'm just sharing what I saw here in my computer: the game runs way better now with this Steam update. Something was "solved" with it. Fact.

If people are sick enough to demand "proofs", it's not my business, but I don't like to be treated like an idiot who cannot test performance increases and FOR SURE I i'm not a liar.

Simple as that. If your performance didn't change, some people have NOTICEABLE gains. Live with that.

[ACE-OF-ACES]

cheesehawk:
I have a few Steam games, if this was merely a Steam update, then they would have had downloads applied also. Since there were none, we'll have to assume this was a CoD update.

And..

cheesehawk:
The game I started wasn't CoD, but the update was to CoD. So still something was applied to CoD, not Steam.

So, just to be clear..

based on cheesehawk's responce, it is safe to assume that he has answered YES to both of the following questions

1. (Y/N) Does it make sense to have members of your software team developing a patch to fix 'video A', and at the same time have your software team developing a patch that is going to replace 'video A' with 'video B' just days later?
   
2. (Y/N) Does it make sense to have members of your software team develop and release a patch that does not change the version number?