Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-29-2007, 01:03 AM
HanzBlixz HanzBlixz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 36
Default

Hmmm...

Skies~of~Fire stats page. http://www.skiesoffire.org/modules.php?name=RStats

AAA_BadBoy The stats look bad however.
Last mission... 9 enemy kills <- in one flight.
Last two missions 16 kills in two flights??
Hit bullets=29 and at the same time enemy aircraft Kills=18

29 kills with only 18 hits all in a matter of minutes online.

Killed 3 B25 bombers offline with a short burst.
Destroyed cars, tanks and AAA from miles away.
Online Destroys 9 enemy with 2 short burst from miles away.

Edit* I have viewed the online long range vulche from several angles and added a 3rd ntrk to the zip file. I don't see anyone firing near the base on the first burst. Spontaneous combustion? Then on the second burst you do see another vulcher, but you can see his name and he fires after the main explosion. At the same time you don't see AAA_Badboy anywhere near the base, but if you watch the chat, he gets credit for the kills. The callsigns destroyed also match the stats page.

I think what the tracks above show, is that it can be done offline and online. I dont know how someone can make a trick ntrk and then on the same day hack the Skies~of~Fire stats page. I'm sure there must be an easy explanation... can't wait to hear it.

3 ntrks with the alternate view. http://rapidshare.com/files/79753704...angle.zip.html

*Edit -Update: I talked with Skies~of~Fire RS admin and they confirmed the film is legit. They had another track and banned the player immediatley. This was done before I posted the track here. Congrats to RS for taking immediate action.

Last edited by HanzBlixz; 12-29-2007 at 02:11 AM. Reason: Added 3rd ntrk - edit RS feedback
  #2  
Old 12-29-2007, 03:35 AM
zapatista's Avatar
zapatista zapatista is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,172
Default

HanzBlixz,

good post, and the priv msg'ing at AAA about FM/DM hacks is the same that i had heard about, so its good to see it confirmed by somebody else as well.

the AAA-badboy stats speak for themselves really, he's not even bright enough to pick a name that doesnt link him to AAA

and no sign of a new protection in 4.09 beta, this means its unlikely to be added to 4.09
  #3  
Old 12-29-2007, 03:46 AM
zapatista's Avatar
zapatista zapatista is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,172
Default

and just so we keep the relevant information in one place,

....confirmation of weapons being altered at other il2 hack forums

Quote:
Originally Posted by uf_josse View Post
Hi all

So, Bearcat, i am here, you can fire at will

Yes, i am modding, yes, with some modders, we have made our own site...

And yes, i made some types of mods, like modification on clouds, smoke visibility, new smokes for trains and more longer wreckage smokes, new QMB with more options, french localisation of the sound mod and much more.....

Why we did'nt have some options like smoke and visibility is clearly because at the beginning of the game, PCS can't run such options without falling on knees... it was a good choice of Oleg and i respect that...

Clearly, i respect Oleg and his work..... but, i found some things really strange , like in weapons and.... yes, i am also tweaking weapons.... is it so bad that italians have correct machine guns or 13.2 MG on IAR instead MG131 ? Ask romanian peoples

So, i know (as many people said to me) that only the .50 are to weak i received many mps to say me that the only prob in the sim was the weakness of .50 but, dont touch other weapons........ pathetic for me.

Italian or romanian weapons, by example are clearly widly undermodeled. Not impressions..... just facts and numbers i can see.

So, discuss is impossible here , enough flameware......

I tried to discuss at AAA and.... nothing was really clear, only the clear will of MrJolly to no accept DM/FM/Weapons modding.... so as said as AAA, accept or leave..... i did'nt agree, i leaved.

But, yes, i will continue, diffuse my mods, never for DM or FM, just for weapons, but not only... i will try to repaint some pits, like IAR.... but, don't be affraid, breda are allways much weaker than .50, just more accurate.

Italians pilots can now shoot allied planes like in real life. No more, no less. .50 have now more API... better for pacific, harder for western front. to shoot down and flame foe planes. Where is the problem ? Yak can now suffering dammage by 13.2 MG, is it a so great crime ? only red can win ?

One more time, only modding weapons trying to have more accuracy.... it is my crime, i am here, fire at will...

BTW, i think that the greatest danger for all is to hide all is not declared politcally correct.... this way , has nobody any view or control on what is done..... your force modders like me to be "underground"...... bad thing IMHO.

You will never know what we are doing and for this reason, you just have to be affraid and it maintain suspicion , for all.... that will kill the community, not the mods. Here is the shame. Hidding things are the best way to suspicion and ...... silent modders that will cheating.... not my way, but i am not alone. What i can do with weapons is really simple to do. The difference is so tiny, that i am pretty sure some of you have allready been shot down by modded weapons, and you saw surely nothing.....

ANd BTW, yes, i allready modified a flightmodel.... it was surely the greatest cheat in the net...... i put LI-2 FM on C47....... just, LI2 has no prob with COG as C47 have.... Wow, what a cheat

Over and out for me.
and

Quote:
Originally Posted by BSS_Sniper View Post
I just read, again, at that other site that someone modded specific aircraft WM to use safat rounds. Rone or Josse ring a bell? That isn't the only WM mod either.

Last edited by zapatista; 12-29-2007 at 04:02 AM.
  #4  
Old 12-29-2007, 04:03 AM
HanzBlixz HanzBlixz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 36
Default

In defense of AAA..

"he's not even bright enough to pick a name that doesnt link him to AAA"
The callsign may be bogus or it may be a former member who is upset with them.

"no sign of a new protection in 4.09 beta" This doesn't necessarily mean that the 409 server won't.

Also, its very important to point out..
Skies~of~Fire did a great job at catching this and not allowing it.
The admin on Skies~of~Fire had their own ntrk and immediately banned the person.

Last edited by HanzBlixz; 12-29-2007 at 04:23 AM.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.