Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-01-2011, 07:44 PM
catito14 catito14 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 119
Default

It was not solved in the "Spitfire II" the problem of negative G?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-01-2011, 08:33 PM
catito14 catito14 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 119
Default

Oh, i see. Thanks for the clarification cheesehawk!

Regards
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-01-2011, 09:41 PM
Das Attorney Das Attorney is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 142
Default

It was a lady's orifice....err idea

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miss_Shilling's_orifice
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-02-2011, 04:55 PM
whoarmongar whoarmongar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 265
Default

A stop gap "fix" to the neg G cut out came in March 1941 with the fitting of the famous "Miss Shillings orifice" developed by Miss Tilly Shilling this was superseded by true negative G carbs fitted from 1943 onwards.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-02-2011, 05:34 PM
TomcatViP TomcatViP is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,323
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whoarmongar View Post
A stop gap "fix" to the neg G cut out came in March 1941 with the fitting of the famous "Miss Shillings orifice" developed by Miss Tilly Shilling this was superseded by true negative G carbs fitted from 1943 onwards.
+1
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-08-2011, 07:09 PM
catito14 catito14 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 119
Default

It is possible that the devs have made a mistake by putting the "Spitfire IIa" when it should be the "Spitfire Ia" ROTOL? ´Cause I see no performance difference between one and another, except for the best use of prop.
So i believe that the "Spitfire IIa" IS really an Spitfire Ia with rotol with an grammatical mistake.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-08-2011, 08:24 PM
Das Attorney Das Attorney is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 142
Default

Here's part of the engine config from the I, Ia and IIa

Spitfire I

PHP Code:
Propulsion          Engine Rolls-Royce MerlinIII Propellor deHavilland 5-20 
Spitfire Ia

PHP Code:
Propulsion          Engine Rolls-Royce MerlinIII Propellor Rotol RMS-
Spitfire IIa

PHP Code:
Propulsion          Engine Rolls-Royce MerlinXII Propellor Rotol RMS-
Looks like it's got the Rotol to me. Whether it's working properly in game is another matter.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.