Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-30-2011, 06:22 AM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by baronWastelan View Post
Let it go David, you didn't see what I was talking about in the trailer, hence you called my description "absurd", then after Sokol1, who did see and understand, posted images to illustrate it, you turned it into a word game.
No, I saw exactly what you saw, and it was obviously a montage. But, let's assume for a second you are right. Let's assume that the movie has a scene where a P-51 driver shoots the wing off a 109 which then morphs into a 262.

Do you think that:

a. The people who made this movie really don't know the difference between a 262 and a 109.

or

b. it's a plot device to get the movie from mid/late 1944 to the end of the war.

Basically, there are 2 possibilities.

1. You made an absurd assumption.

2. You made an absurd assumption.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-30-2011, 06:38 AM
baronWastelan baronWastelan is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: the future home of Starfleet Academy
Posts: 628
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Hayward View Post
No, I saw exactly what you saw, and it was obviously a montage. But, let's assume for a second you are right. Let's assume that the movie has a scene where a P-51 driver shoots the wing off a 109 which then morphs into a 262.

Do you think that:

a. The people who made this movie really don't know the difference between a 262 and a 109.

or

b. it's a plot device to get the movie from mid/late 1944 to the end of the war.

Basically, there are 2 possibilities.

1. You made an absurd assumption.

2. You made an absurd assumption.
You obviously have some sort of fixation on me. In any case, I have better things to do than engage with my latest internet stalker. If you want to further discuss the scene at 2:15, please address your posts to the one who kindly went to the trouble to illustrate my point with screenshots so that you could understand:

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...1&postcount=16

Now, kindly remove yourself from my leg, nobody here is interested in seeing such a display, which has no place in this discussion.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-30-2011, 06:41 AM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Your surrender is duly noted.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-30-2011, 07:08 AM
retrojet retrojet is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 171
Default

I sometimes feel that a 'smiley' here and there, tends to take the chill out, wouldn't you agree?
Or am I being over sensitive?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-30-2011, 03:35 PM
yellonet yellonet is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Hayward View Post
Your surrender is duly noted.
Take a look at this:

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-30-2011, 03:37 PM
Hooves Hooves is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 131
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Hayward View Post
No, I saw exactly what you saw, and it was obviously a montage. But, let's assume for a second you are right. Let's assume that the movie has a scene where a P-51 driver shoots the wing off a 109 which then morphs into a 262.

Do you think that:

a. The people who made this movie really don't know the difference between a 262 and a 109.

or

b. it's a plot device to get the movie from mid/late 1944 to the end of the war.

Basically, there are 2 possibilities.

1. You made an absurd assumption.

2. You made an absurd assumption.
you hit this right on the head bro.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-30-2011, 03:41 PM
yellonet yellonet is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 169
Default

I love how it says "Inspired by TRUE EVENTS", the first word probably being somewhat determining of the content of the movie
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-30-2011, 03:48 PM
JG52Uther's Avatar
JG52Uther JG52Uther is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,358
Default

Its a Hollywood war movie from George Lucas.
I don't expect much in the way of accuracy, but will probably end up watching it at some point, just for the 'LOL!' moments, the 'WTF!' moments, and the 'FFS!' moments...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.