Saitek x52Pro and Pedals £150 yes or no?

[Ze-Jamz]

Oh well too late now, guess i have to find out for myself.

there seems to be a few issues with the g940 as there are with a lot of sticks but Im hoping they are small enough for me to not notice or compensate for and hopefully will get addressed with firmware..

[Ze-Jamz]

Yea will do fellas

[Artist]

Originally Posted by Ze-Jamz

there seems to be a few issues with the g940 as there are with a lot of sticks but Im hoping they are small enough for me to not notice or compensate for

Could be - the community seem to be split (50-50?): There are many who have absolutely no problem with the ReversalBug and many (like me) who find it intolerable.

Originally Posted by Ze-Jamz

and hopefully will get addressed with firmware...

No, probably not:

(selfquote from another thread)
[...] Only the X and Y axes of the stick are hall-sensored. All other axes have 'cheap' pots (I've seen those on the throttle-levers when I modded mine): trim1-3, throttle-levers 1 an 2, R1 and R2, the pedals, and the 2 toe-brakes.

Purportedly this is the reason why Logitech has fixed (well, minimized) the ReversalBug on X and Y axes of the stick, but has not done anything about all the other axes, and as rumour has it, will not ever (see here and here).

The reason behind this refusal is - again a rumour - that the ReversalBug prevents users from noticing the wearing-out of the cheap pots - because they're already used to this kind of behaviour. It makes sense to me, because the ReversalBug is, as Sokol1 wrote, in the Firmware and (a) was easily fixed for the hall sensored axes and completely disappears when you connect the pot-sensored axes to one of Bodnar's boards.

But then you can mod it anytime. We'll help

Artist