Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-20-2011, 04:25 PM
klem's Avatar
klem klem is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,653
Default

adonys, etc, you are wasting your time.

Luthier has spoken at last - yesterday in his US release announcement. He has no communications 'resource' and clearly has no intention of spending 15 minutes on it himself. As infuriating and offensive as that may be, we're stuck with it. There's nothing we can do.

However, this is a direct matter between us and the manufacturer of a defective product and this, their forum, seems to be a reasonable way to contact them, especially as they say they are always looking at it for our feedback. If the self-righteous, self-appointed spokesmen for Luthier stopped poking their noses into what is a direct request from some of us to Luthier these threads would be a lot shorter. And if Luthier put finger to keyboard once a week there would be far fewer of them.

Our CoD software is effectively under repair and ours has been a legitimate request for progress information. The whining is coming from those who for some reason don't want to hear it and are happy to roll over and lay in the dark whilst goading the rest of us. Or perhaps it just makes them feel important. Can they really not be interested in when the major bugs will be fixed?
__________________
klem
56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds"
http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/



ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU
Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders
  #2  
Old 07-20-2011, 04:00 PM
Pudfark Pudfark is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 363
Default

No Message is a Message

Obviously, some folks here still believe in the Easter Bunny.
They take much delight...In making excuses for the Bunny.

"The squeaky wheel gets the grease"
  #3  
Old 07-20-2011, 03:45 PM
Ataros Ataros is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: USSR
Posts: 2,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Opitz View Post
Sorry, mate but THIS is hillarious, indeed... What about ROF guys? They have no problem to answer many questions... Jason is writing there too... He was even writing on forum from E3, when there was problem with credit card payments... It is all about priorities...
100% wrong comparison. Jason represents 777 which is a RoF publisher. Or you can call them independent developer. They get the money for communication from sales. This is their job to communicate.

UBI is CoD publisher. It keeps the money for communication from sales. It is UBI job to communicate. 1C/MG does not get this part of money and this is why can not hire a communication manager. They provide support on these forums for free and as a goodwill. Your attitude does not encourage this goodwill much. You did not even bother to read this post explaining how it works or could not get it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by robtek View Post
Opitz, you are so full of yourself.

You didn't even research, no thats too much, you didn't even look how MG, 1c and UBI are connected.

It was already posted quite a few times.

MG is the developer, thats it, nothing more.

Devs don't do marketing!

1c is the publisher, the publisher does the financing and, here it comes, the marketing.
In the case of 1c only in the east.

In the rest of the world UBI is the publisher and accountable for the marketing.

We here have the unique situation that the devs are talking directly to us, they don't have to do this, there is no obligation, but they do it anyway.

So you are ranting against MG, which already does more than it has to do (fixing the sim) by giving us information that the publisher didn't give.

Next you say that Luthier, a person, i assume, you dont know personally, is incompetent.
Whow, i envy your insights in the workings of MG, you've worked there, or at least visited the company a few times.
Nah, i dont think so.

Furthermore you implement that somebody doesn't care if the faults are fixed, that talks a lot about your state of mind.

If one doesn't has to post something positive (pointing out bugs and errors is positive) and new, one shouldn't post at all.

Ooops! Reading my last sentence i shouldn't have posted this. Sorry, couldn't help it.

Last edited by Ataros; 07-20-2011 at 03:49 PM.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.