|
|
|
|
#3
12-16-2007, 05:15 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Yes but I am quite worried that I have been threatened on this forum.someone has said they will 'nuke my pc'. what can I do? Does anyone have a link to a good antivirus programme?
I would hate for some hacker to get in my pc? would a firewall help? Is he allowed to threaten me? Last edited by JG52Uther; 12-16-2007 at 10:00 PM. |
|
#4
12-16-2007, 05:21 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
http://free.grisoft.com/doc/2/lng/us/tpl/v5
Is free and good. Activate Windows firewall. Please only discuss the Mod here and refrain from personal stuff. |
|
#5
12-16-2007, 08:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm still waiting for the proof that hackers are not flying online in coops/wars/DF servers using all of the many advantages the hack enables them to use.
As I mainly fly COOPS or Warclouds servers I tend to keep away from the main culprits in the DF servers BECAUSE of the the OBVIOUS hacking that is going on in many of them at the minute. As I see the pro-hack types have simply chosen to ignore my last post and not address any of the issues(too tricky to deal with eh?) I raised, this is jus a gentle reminder.... still waiting guys......... in case you simply missed it here are the main points: The hackers as usual have got this point about "proof" arse about face. 1. They have to prove to the legal community that no-one is altering the FM/DM files (which believe me is EASY to do). 2. They have to prove that no-one is "tweaking" the FMs just enough to give them a distinct advantage which is difficult to both see and prove. 3. They have to prove that no-one is flying with no cockpit and or 6dof in cockpit on servers. 4. They have to prove that no-one is making friendly a/c camouflaged and enemy flourescent. 5. How many more of the hacks open to the hackers shall I post? 6. No-one has "proven" ANYTHING about the EULA other than it is a legally compliant article, there are NO court appointed judges in this forum with the legal authority to make ANY judgement about legally binding contracts. 7. It is not for the legal members of the community to prove ANYTHING, it is for the illegal hackers to prove their arguments that their hack does not enable them to cheat PERIOD. I see they are now trying to muddy the waters further by posting more threads demanding proof, maybe they should actually post the proof to the questions above first and some of us might take them a bit more seriously(not). Last edited by 123-Wulf-123; 12-16-2007 at 08:19 PM. |
|
#7
12-16-2007, 08:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well considering some of the disgusting personal attacks by certain pro-hackers I can't for the life of me see any further reason to attempt debate, mainly because they simply seem to have forgotten to answer any of the points raised, by many members here.
They are in a corner, they know it, and like rats they will attack anyone , frankly the longer it goes on the less and less credible they become. Over and out. |
|
#8
12-17-2007, 10:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
and as far as personal attakcs go, the only one i've seen is the "i'll nuke ur pc" a few pages back. for what it's worth, it has always been possible to cheat in vanilla il-2 by simply fiddling with the sound setting to get that sound radar thing... Last edited by Lo0n; 12-17-2007 at 10:18 AM. Reason: addition |
|
#9
12-17-2007, 10:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
in the united states, bonehead is a complement, now if he had called him a "meathead" well thats another matter
|
|
#10
12-17-2007, 11:26 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
checkruntime=2 doesnt block anything, it might have done on the initial hack, but not now. and that is the exact problem, there is no hack block whatsoever anymore. at least try and be up to date if you are going to try and correct him |
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
