![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
View Poll Results: How happy are you with the current state of COD terrain? | |||
Very Happy - the terrain is currently excellent and requires little or no change |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
16 | 6.37% |
Generally Happy - the terrain is good, but there is room for improvement |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
140 | 55.78% |
Generally Unhappy - the terrain is poor, and requires significant work to be done |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
62 | 24.70% |
Very Unhappy - the terrain is so bad that it makes me reluctant to fly a mission |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
33 | 13.15% |
Voters: 251. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
low.jpg vs high.jpg
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I voted generally happy. The one terrain thing I notice every time I fly that could do with work is the way that the shoreline render essentially draws over the top of the water render. The effect this has is to slightly shrink the area the water covers (specifically inland rivers & lakes) as the edges are drawn over by the shoreline render. As this is a distance affected render, as the river or lake becomes more distant the shoreline render dissapears. The overall and undesirable affect is that rivers and lakes appear to get wider and wider the further into the distance they get, resulting in a kind of patchwork land archipelago effect. It would almost be better if the shoreline was only rendered at distance, and dissapeared close up but that would kind of defeat the point of it.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|