Poll - COD Terrain: Your Opinion

[robtek]

Originally Posted by RCAF_FB_Orville

'where your assumption/spin comes from is beyond me.'

Maybe this will help.

Generally Happy - the terrain is good, but there is room for improvement 61.8%

I wrote 'the vast majority feel there is at least some definite room for improvement'.....true, with varying degrees of happiness. All agree that improvement is needed.

No assumption. No spin. You really need to read peoples posts more carefully. I think you'll find everything I wrote is true..........

No, Orville, you did definitely lie!
You said "No spin" but you tried to include the "generally happy crowd" to the unhappy side.
The name "Muhammad Saeed al-Sahhaf" comes to mind. ;D ;D

[RCAF_FB_Orville]

Originally Posted by robtek

No, Orville, you did definitely lie!
You said "No spin" but you tried to include the "generally happy crowd" to the unhappy side.
The name "Muhammad Saeed al-Sahhaf" comes to mind. ;D ;D

you tried to include the "generally happy crowd" to the unhappy side.

LOL....No I didn't. At all.

Read what I wrote again please. I said 'the vast majority feel there is at least some definite room for improvement', which when all groups are considered (generally happy of course included) is indisputably true. And leave Joseph alone, you fiend. Stop winding me up as well, LOL.

@baron, theres nothing wrong with me mate. I'm not the one who called someone a 'pig' the other day on this forum for having a contrary view, then deleted it so you might want to ask yourself that question. You do it all the time. What I wrote was to illustrate a point, call it 'a dose of your own medicine' or responding in kind. Yes it was rude. Deliberately so and for a reason. Not nice is it, very annoying.

Getting boring now anyway, no more tit for tat. Waste of time.

PS I've got nothing against you baron (sincerely).....so lets just leave it at that. Aye?

Cheers.

Peace be with you all.

[Baron]

Originally Posted by RCAF_FB_Orville

you tried to include the "generally happy crowd" to the unhappy side.

LOL....No I didn't. At all.

Read what I wrote again please. I said 'the vast majority feel there is at least some definite room for improvement', which when all groups are considered is indisputably true. And leave Joseph alone, you fiend. Stop winding me up as well, LOL.

@baron, theres nothing wrong with me mate. I'm not the one who called someone a 'pig' the other day on this forum for having a contrary view, then deleted it so you might want to ask yourself that question. You do it all the time. What I wrote was to illustrate a point, call it 'a dose of your own medicine' or responding in kind. Yes it was rude. Deliberately so and for a reason. Not nice is it, very annoying.

Getting boring now anyway, no more tit for tat. Waste of time.

PS I've got nothing against you baron (sincerely).....so lets just leave it at that. Aye?

Cheers.

Peace be with you all.

"just leave it at that"? Seriously?

Where the #¤#% did i call anyone a pig? I called someone a pig and then deleted it? U know, i saw u admit to being an avid fan of Sim City last week, but then u deleted it. What should i do? And good luck disproving me btw. The least u can do is to point me towards the post in witch i called someone a pig (and then deleted it)

But go right ahead and accuse me of things that never happened if you want to go down that route.

And dont tell me, im still the one who has to watch his manners?

This forum is getting freakier and freakier by the minute.

And just so u know, i have no opinion of u what so ever either, but where u get your "personal" stuff from is beyond me.

Either u are confusing me with someone else or u out right make stuff up. Witch is it?


What is it with the personal stuff anyway, is it that much of an ordeal being quoted and disagreed on?

[RCAF_FB_Orville]

Originally Posted by Baron

"just leave it at that"? Seriously?

Where the #¤#% did i call anyone a pig? I called someone a pig and then deleted it? U know, i saw u admit to being an avid fan of Sim City last week, but then u deleted it. What should i do? And good luck disproving me btw.

But go right ahead and accuse me of things that never happened if you want to go down that route.

And dont tell me, im still the one who has to watch his manners?

This forum is getting freakier and freakier by the minute.

And just so u know, i have no opinion of u what so ever, but where u get your "personal" stuff from is beyond me.

Actually you are right baron and I apologise, I'm typing this on a tiny screen, and doing 3 things at once.... I just mixed you up with baronwastelan....so my mistake and sorry. It was not you at all but him. I write baron short for baronwastelan too to save time, its my bad mate and not directed at you at all.

Okey dokey.

[Baron]

Originally Posted by RCAF_FB_Orville

Actually you are right baron and I apologise, I'm typing this on a tiny screen, and doing 3 things at once.... I just mixed you up with baronwastelan....so my mistake and sorry. It was not you at all but him. I write baron short for baronwastelan too to save time, its my bad mate and not directed at you at all.

Okey dokey.

NP, i thought as much and for everyone's sake lets get back on topic.

[Rattlehead]

Originally Posted by Baron

This forum is getting freakier and freakier by the minute.

We need another Chuck Norris thread. Lighten the mood a bit.

would you all vote in my texture sizes poll please. http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=24486

[Baron]

Originally Posted by Rattlehead

We need another Chuck Norris thread. Lighten the mood a bit.

Said, based on a misunderstanding.

[flyingblind]

Given the constraints imposed by computer resource limitations I don't think the landscape is too bad. Field textures and colour are not that far out apart from modern crop spraying tracks in some of the fields which, given the amount of work needed to remove, are no doubt there to stay. English hedges, or at least the impression of them, could do with improvement. Again trees are always going to be limited by computer resources and as they stand they lack much variation. Back in the 40s the predominant tree was the English Elm, very dark and imposing, which made the landscape look like a typical Constable painting.They were pretty well wiped out in the 70s by Dutch Elm Beetle. I think the biggest improvement that can and probably will be made is the water and particularly the shore line. The mud flats of the Thames Estuary and The Wash are almost as iconic as the White Cliffs. I think it was said in a post by Luthier that water will be transparent so maybe they will come to life a bit. Have a look at Google Maps and Google Earth to get an idea of how they should look. So all in all I am one of the majority and checked button 2.