![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
| View Poll Results: How happy are you with the current state of COD terrain? | |||
| Very Happy - the terrain is currently excellent and requires little or no change |
|
16 | 6.37% |
| Generally Happy - the terrain is good, but there is room for improvement |
|
140 | 55.78% |
| Generally Unhappy - the terrain is poor, and requires significant work to be done |
|
62 | 24.70% |
| Very Unhappy - the terrain is so bad that it makes me reluctant to fly a mission |
|
33 | 13.15% |
| Voters: 251. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Put me in the "Generally Happy" category. I never notice it I am not sightseeing I am hunting. I only notice it while I am getting good guncam footage of my kill. Other than this I don't care. As long as my bird goes where I point it I am all good.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
As for the original topic, put me in the generally happy category. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Knowing that half the people who post on this forum are miserable and generally failures in life, the relatively low proportion of "unhappy" votes shows how good the terrain is.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Actually, I think the results show that 1/3 of people are unhappy with the terrain, as opposed to a very small minority of 'see no evil, hear no evil' sycophants with their heads buried firmly in the sand being quite ecstatic (currently around a paltry 5%). It also shows that the vast majority feel there is at least some definite room for improvement. I know you were in the 'woopy doo' very happy brown noser brigade minority, but wake up and smell the coffee Man....you are very much outvoted. You might want to think about a career as a party political 'spin doctor' though, I think you'd do fine. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
32.5% is generally unhappy or less. so where your assumption/spin comes from is beyond me. YOU are the one in minority and as usual the minority is the one screaming the loudest and resort to name calling to compensate for exactly that, being a minority. I do like how YOU choose to read the poll though. P.s. I voted for generally happy but there is room for improvement. That however doesn't mean most people generally think the terrain is crap because there is room for improvement, like u seem to imply. There is room for improvement in a lot of things, like there always is in a flight sim. (IL2 Sturmovik ring a bell?). And so u get what im saying, no its not the end of all things for me if they dont do anything else to the terrain. Last edited by Baron; 07-13-2011 at 11:39 AM. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
'where your assumption/spin comes from is beyond me.' Maybe this will help. Generally Happy - the terrain is good, but there is room for improvement 61.8% I wrote 'the vast majority feel there is at least some definite room for improvement'.....true, with varying degrees of happiness. All agree that improvement is needed. No assumption. No spin. You really need to read peoples posts more carefully. I think you'll find everything I wrote is true. I wrote a 1/3 of people are unhappy. Again true. PS Baron edit your post quickly or you will get banned (the S word), friendly advice as they are getting Medieval on some words. As for being 'personal'. Please listen to yourself and your previous belligerent and insulting tone. Read what I was replying to. 'half the people who post on this forum are miserable and generally failures in life'. Nice! Real gent on our hands here chaps. 'YOU are the one in minority' Actually, I'm not. I voted for the same option as you. Wrong again. Check the attitude, man. You habitually insult posters on more than this forum (the Zoo too) but this is obviously normal to you. You seem to think anyone who voices criticism hates 1c and CoD and everything has to be polarised. Ridiculous. This is a public forum, the express purpose of which is an exchange of opinions and ideas. Not everyone will agree with your world view or position. It's called life. Deal with it baron. Again baron, scrub that 'S' word sharpish or they will ban you, no need to thank me. *EDIT: Ah I see you now have.....nice one. Err, my bad actually you haven't. Oh well I tried. Anyway, just read the OP and he's right so that's all from me. Last edited by RCAF_FB_Orville; 07-13-2011 at 10:36 AM. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Seriously, nock it of. ( i better put some of thees in here I said "That however doesn't mean most people generally think the terrain is sh*t", i dint call anyone anything anywhere. U however said: "as opposed to a very small minority of 'see no evil, hear no evil' sycophants" and "I know you were in the 'woopy doo' very happy brown noser brigade minority, but wake up and smell the coffee Man" And u say i use a belligerent and insulting tone and i need to check my attitude? Whats wrong with u? And where the ¤%&&%¤ did i say people cant have an opinion and where the &&¤%&&// did i polarize? BTW, what has this: "Read what I was replying to. 'half the people who post on this forum are miserable and generally failures in life'. Nice! Real gent on our hands here chaps. Edit: And as far as the "minority" thing goes, people who are GENERALLY unhappy with the terrain is STILL a minority and people who are GENERALLY happy with the terrain is a majority witch was what i said in reply to your first post in the first place. And to make it even clearer for u: Just because i voted "generally happy with room for improvement" i sure as he** don't count my self into the "generally unhappy side" Last edited by Baron; 07-13-2011 at 12:26 PM. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
You said "No spin" but you tried to include the "generally happy crowd" to the unhappy side. The name "Muhammad Saeed al-Sahhaf" comes to mind. ;D ;D
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects ![]() Last edited by robtek; 07-13-2011 at 11:52 AM. Reason: political incorrectness naming "Joseph" |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|