Poll - COD Terrain: Your Opinion

[furbs]

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM View Post
Well, some have real "orgasms" with RoF terrain, some dislike SpeedTrees, but I laught when look at the "spinning trees" of RoF graphic engine.. ^^

All graphics engines have some flaws. The big ones in CloD today are all "placeholders", minor tweaks in visual and optimization problems. All the basics are there to a lot of evolution.

Placeholders? To be fair, you just made that up.

[LoBiSoMeM]

Originally Posted by furbs

Placeholders? To be fair, you just made that up.

Water and clounds are stated as "placeholders" by dev team a lot of times.

[Mysticpuma]

I was hoping to have an option 5 in the list as I voted for Option 4 due to the fact there is such a short draw/texture fill distance that everything can be seen being drawn or appearing like popcorn as you fly over the ground.

I could probably live with the non-UK landscape if this was fixed or could be worked on.

Surely in this day and age some use of AF could be used, or even the dreaded (but useful) smog/haze/UV effect to hide the pop-ups?

I don't understand why AF can't be used to blend the object together and then 'bleed' them into view rather than popping them up?

Anyway, Voted 4, but would go 2 if the pop-up could be fixed.

MP

[furbs]

Clouds, yes.

But ive not seen the devs say anything about any other stuff.

Oh you could mean this...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G836q...el_video_title

where Oleg said the sound was a "placeholder"...when it wasn't, it was the sound we got.

Originally Posted by furbs

Clouds, yes.

But ive not seen the devs say anything about any other stuff.

Oh you could mean this...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G836q...el_video_title

where Oleg said the sound was a "placeholder"...when it wasn't, it was the sound we got.

Well we all know now that Oleg was lying his pants off about pretty much everything during development, no wonder he did a runner, imagine him trying to get out of all the bollocks he told us here and in the interviews he did. I hope it all comes back to haunt him oneday.

[carguy_]

Originally Posted by Crane

Well we all know now that Oleg was lying his pants off about pretty much everything during development, no wonder he did a runner, imagine him trying to get out of all the bollocks he told us here and in the interviews he did. I hope it all comes back to haunt him oneday.

Oleg? He isn`t here. But it is obvious you have a need to blame SOMEONE so be it. It`s not like you`d ever stop. That said, I hope all the bs worthless bickering you said will come back to haunt you one day.

Originally Posted by carguy_

Oleg? He isn`t here. But it is obvious you have a need to blame SOMEONE so be it. It`s not like you`d ever stop. That said, I hope all the bs worthless bickering you said will come back to haunt you one day.

So do I, because then i will be able to play the game I PAID FOR!!

[LoBiSoMeM]

Originally Posted by furbs

where Oleg said the sound was a "placeholder"...when it wasn't, it was the sound we got.

We got a lot of placeholders, unfortunately:

Only up to DX10 suport, all weather system, sound system, even menu parts... Well, I'm happy that they aren't suposed to be the final ones. You and all naysayers can be unhappy, not me. I can wait step by step the evolution of this sim engine.

Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM

I can wait step by step the evolution of this sim engine.

Like you have a choice??

[Tiger27]

Originally Posted by furbs

Clouds, yes.

But ive not seen the devs say anything about any other stuff.

Oh you could mean this...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G836q...el_video_title

where Oleg said the sound was a "placeholder"...when it wasn't, it was the sound we got.

No it's a placeholder, that is why they are re-doing it, acording to Luthier it's a month or so away, you do understand the term placeholder furbs? its the sound we got until they finish the sounds we will get