Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-01-2011, 09:29 PM
Orpheus Orpheus is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 235
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ze-Jamz View Post
Please be quiet.
We're not allowed to swear on this forum, so I'll leave you to guess what I'm thinking. Considering the great majority of modern PCs run Win7, a benchmark tool that is included, that doesn't require any extra software would at least give us a general indication of performance across a wide range of common system configs, and is far more likely to be used by the average forum reader as it doesn't require any extra effort. I don't think anyone is expecting it to be perfect, but it's a start.

All I see is the OP trying to be helpful - if that's a problem for you, perhaps you should consider not acting like a spoiled child and grow up - or GTFO and leave this thread to people who actually want to help. There seems to be a regular retard-squad on this forum who believe that everything is Steam's fault; that anything later than Win XP isn't worth having, that refuse to use anything other than hyperlobby and complain at every effort to solve problems and frankly I'm sick and tired of it. If you want to stick with decade old rubbish that's your bag, but don't inflict it on the rest of us, or whine when you don't get your way.

Last edited by Orpheus; 07-01-2011 at 09:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-01-2011, 10:34 PM
nearmiss nearmiss is offline
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,687
Default

The purpose is to give the developer some idea of how the patches are working for us with our individual system specs.

There are many tools available Open source. Maybe best, if there was some consensus on a tool everyone can use and discusses BOB COD performance issues.

The system spec isn't bad either, but it does require some further investigation by the developer to find issues.

I do see some some darn good video releases, which tells me everyone doesn't have the issues others describe as unworkable.

Some members keep on their whine, whle others are doing well with the COD. There are reasons for the differences. If there is some way to give the developers competent information, apart from whines, I am for that.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-01-2011, 10:39 PM
zoopyzook zoopyzook is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 47
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nearmiss View Post
The purpose is to give the developer some idea of how the patches are working for us with our individual system specs.

There are many tools available Open source. Maybe best, if there was some consensus on a tool everyone can use and discusses BOB COD performance issues.

The system spec isn't bad either, but it does require some further investigation by the developer to find issues.

I do see some some darn good video releases, which tells me everyone doesn't have the issues others describe as unworkable.

Some members keep on their whine, whle others are doing well with the COD. There are reasons for the differences. If there is some way to give the developers competent information, apart from whines, I am for that.

Win 7 Experience index isn't really a benchmark why not try 3D Mark 11 http://www.3dmark.com/3dmark11/download/

This is the industry standard after-all
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-01-2011, 10:42 PM
Ze-Jamz Ze-Jamz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: On your six!!
Posts: 2,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zoopyzook View Post
Win 7 Experience index isn't really a benchmark why not try 3D Mark 11 http://www.3dmark.com/3dmark11/download/

This is the industry standard after-all
Or 3D Mark vantage as it doenst need such a high tech system to get half decent results, it allows you to test things easier amongst diff systems

3D mark 11 is cool and and a great program but for me it needs just a bit too much to run properly and get decent scores/running if you get me drift
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-01-2011, 10:46 PM
zoopyzook zoopyzook is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 47
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ze-Jamz View Post
Or 3D Mark vantage as it doenst need such a high tech system to get half decent results, it allows you to test things easier amongst diff systems

3D mark 11 is cool and and a great program but for me it needs just a bit too much to run properly and get decent scores/running if you get me drift
but for an accurate test we all need to be singing off the same hymn sheet.

I can get awesome scores with 3DMark 05
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-01-2011, 10:48 PM
ATAG_Dutch ATAG_Dutch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,793
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zoopyzook View Post
but for an accurate test we all need to be singing off the same hymn sheet.

I can get awesome scores with 3DMark 05
Anyone tried 4BKevin 62?

Sorry, it's that beer again.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-01-2011, 10:55 PM
zoopyzook zoopyzook is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 47
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dutch_851 View Post
Anyone tried 4BKevin 62?

Sorry, it's that beer again.

:shudder: Kevin is actually my RL name
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-01-2011, 10:50 PM
Ze-Jamz Ze-Jamz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: On your six!!
Posts: 2,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zoopyzook View Post
but for an accurate test we all need to be singing off the same hymn sheet.

I can get awesome scores with 3DMark 05
Lol, 3d mark5 was a good benchmark program too..

Heaven is a good free easy to use program, you tried that?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-01-2011, 11:19 PM
Thee_oddball Thee_oddball is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 812
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zoopyzook View Post
but for an accurate test we all need to be singing off the same hymn sheet.

I can get awesome scores with 3DMark 05
if you want a real comparison then we will ALL have tobe running CLOD on FRESH installs of win7 with NOTHING else but the game installed and using the same tool.

S!
__________________
Gigabyte Z68
Intel 2500K (@4.3 ghz)212 CM Cooler
8GB Ram
EVGA 660SC (super clocked) 2GB Vram
CORSAIR CMPSU-750TX 750W
64 GB SSD SATA II HD
WIN7 UL 64BIT
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-01-2011, 11:26 PM
zoopyzook zoopyzook is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 47
Default

3DMark11 score:

P6070 3DMarks

but apparently its telling me that my Drivers are out of date.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.