Waste of money

Originally Posted by Ataros

Do not forget that different people have different views on what is cartoonish and what is close to photo-realistic. Tastes differ as they say. Thanks God and MG we have different sims for different tastes.

Textures high (not original maximal), landscape shading medium, low forest, buildings and AA. Driver settings set on "quality" instead of "high quality" due to old and slow videocard.
Files are in compressed jpeg, not png.

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-k...5-19_00032.jpg

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-g...5-21_00038.jpg

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-s...5-11_00035.jpg

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-j...5-06_00001.jpg

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-x...5-06_00002.jpg

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-M...5-06_00003.jpg

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-d...5-06_00006.jpg

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-L...5-03_00019.jpg

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-q...5-03_00018.jpg

These shots are really nice. But... as Mysticpuma said - on thing is a static shot on the ground and second is from 2+km altitude having in mind all known problems with FPS, sounds and other bugs... It is just not consistent... Something is really nice, hands down, the cockpits for example, but then you must live with terrible sounds or radio mess, old IL2 AI stupidity etc..