Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-24-2011, 06:08 PM
LoBiSoMeM LoBiSoMeM is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 963
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David198502 View Post
yeah,...i guess everybody who has problems with this sim needs a console now!
Yes.

I bought this sim at the release. Was unplayable in my old rig (Phenom x4, ATI 4850).

Patch after patch performance was improved contantly. But this improvements need some work to be made by the final user: the final user need to READ FORUM TOPICS!

If people can do simple things like don't screw the conf.ini, clear cache after/before patching and (don't know why but works sometimes) get rid of UBI logo, the game will be fluid, at least in a quadcore with 4GB of ram and one 560ti 1GB (my new VGA). People with better hardware than that that still talking crap about performance decrease after patch need to buy consoles. They will be more happy!

I have great performance, tiny stutters like IL-2 1946, great visuals, AA working after get rid of UBI logo... All ok, and the major bugs remaining we all know: sound, gameplay issues, etc. They will be solved by steps.

I'm tired of all this crap: peole pretending that 1C was screwing the sim more after each patch: it's a lie. The patching is going ok.

But people need to understand that this sim was delivered in beta stage, witha lot of bug, things to be developed, etc. And need some time reading forums to make some minor tweaks.

Put only blame devs are easier. That's why I say: go buy consoles!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-24-2011, 06:10 PM
Dano Dano is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Petersfield UK
Posts: 1,107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM View Post
Yes.

I bought this sim at the release. Was unplayable in my old rig (Phenom x4, ATI 4850).

Patch after patch performance was improved contantly. But this improvements need some work to be made by the final user: the final user need to READ FORUM TOPICS!

If people can do simple things like don't screw the conf.ini, clear cache after/before patching and (don't know why but works sometimes) get rid of UBI logo, the game will be fluid, at least in a quadcore with 4GB of ram and one 560ti 1GB (my new VGA). People with better hardware than that that still talking crap about performance decrease after patch need to buy consoles. They will be more happy!

I have great performance, tiny stutters like IL-2 1946, great visuals, AA working after get rid of UBI logo... All ok, and the major bugs remaining we all know: sound, gameplay issues, etc. They will be solved by steps.

I'm tired of all this crap: peole pretending that 1C was screwing the sim more after each patch: it's a lie. The patching is going ok.

But people need to understand that this sim was delivered in beta stage, witha lot of bug, things to be developed, etc. And need some time reading forums to make some minor tweaks.

Put only blame devs are easier. That's why I say: go buy consoles!
Stop assuming, it only makes an ass out of you and ming.
__________________
i5 2500k - Asus P8P67Pro - Crucial M4 64GB - 8GB DDR3 - Geforce Ti 560 1GB - Xonar DG - W7 X64 SP1
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-24-2011, 06:13 PM
LoBiSoMeM LoBiSoMeM is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 963
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dano View Post
Stop assuming, it only makes an ass out of you and ming.
Go clear your cache, fix your conf.ini and disable UBI logo and come back here to talking about "20% loss", please...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-24-2011, 06:16 PM
Dano Dano is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Petersfield UK
Posts: 1,107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM View Post
Go clear your cache, fix your conf.ini and disable UBI logo and come back here to talking about "20% loss", please...
'

Yeh, because I've not tried that before

Please get over yourself and quit assuming that just because you have not had a performance drop that everybody else is lying or incompetent if they report one.
__________________
i5 2500k - Asus P8P67Pro - Crucial M4 64GB - 8GB DDR3 - Geforce Ti 560 1GB - Xonar DG - W7 X64 SP1
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-24-2011, 06:15 PM
Blackdog_kt Blackdog_kt is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,715
Default

Thanks for the patch, keep going at it

I'm also hoping you get some spare time to address some gameplay issues found on certain bombers for the next patch (Ju88 gyrocompass not moving, reversed top turret controls in the Br.20, etc) if you haven't already done so.

I'm off to download and test the new patch
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-24-2011, 06:16 PM
ATAG_Dutch ATAG_Dutch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,793
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM View Post
If people can do simple things like don't screw the conf.ini, clear cache after/before patching and (don't know why but works sometimes) get rid of UBI logo, the game will be fluid, at least in a quadcore with 4GB of ram and one 560ti 1GB (my new VGA). People with better hardware than that that still talking crap about performance decrease after patch need to buy consoles.
Yep, done all that, still runs poorly over land. The 5770 is the next thing on the list to replace, but I'm not going to yet, for the reason given above.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-24-2011, 06:23 PM
LoBiSoMeM LoBiSoMeM is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 963
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dutch_851 View Post
Yep, done all that, still runs poorly over land. The 5770 is the next thing on the list to replace, but I'm not going to yet, for the reason given above.
You will probably never run CloD fluid with this VGA in near maximum quality settings, only with medium/low quality settings. I suffer with my old 4850. But after last official patch I was able to fly OK over land with the 4850, only with some settings lower.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-24-2011, 06:34 PM
ATAG_Dutch ATAG_Dutch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,793
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM View Post
You will probably never run CloD fluid with this VGA in near maximum quality settings, only with medium/low quality settings. I suffer with my old 4850. But after last official patch I was able to fly OK over land with the 4850, only with some settings lower.
I don't try to run it on max.

Here's a black death benchmark;

Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg
5240, 216129, 7, 52, 24.245

Medium settings plus grass, shadows, roads.

AA off, epi off, v-synch off, ssao off.

Cache cleared, ubi logo deleted.

All CCC settings to Application Controlled / performance / high performance.

Although this doesn't look too bad, visually the whole thing jerks along over land shots, and smooths out when looking at water or sky.

Last edited by ATAG_Dutch; 06-24-2011 at 06:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-24-2011, 06:36 PM
Bloblast's Avatar
Bloblast Bloblast is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 289
Default

Any FM changes? Tuesday review some people spoke about this, but it is not in the list.
__________________
Intel i7 970 6x3.2
ASUS Sabertooth X58
ASUS GTX580
Corsair 12GB 1600 Mhz
OZC SSD 120GB
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-24-2011, 06:22 PM
David198502's Avatar
David198502 David198502 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Austria
Posts: 1,536
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM View Post
Yes.

I bought this sim at the release. Was unplayable in my old rig (Phenom x4, ATI 4850).

Patch after patch performance was improved contantly. But this improvements need some work to be made by the final user: the final user need to READ FORUM TOPICS!

If people can do simple things like don't screw the conf.ini, clear cache after/before patching and (don't know why but works sometimes) get rid of UBI logo, the game will be fluid, at least in a quadcore with 4GB of ram and one 560ti 1GB (my new VGA). People with better hardware than that that still talking crap about performance decrease after patch need to buy consoles. They will be more happy!

I have great performance, tiny stutters like IL-2 1946, great visuals, AA working after get rid of UBI logo... All ok, and the major bugs remaining we all know: sound, gameplay issues, etc. They will be solved by steps.

I'm tired of all this crap: peole pretending that 1C was screwing the sim more after each patch: it's a lie. The patching is going ok.

But people need to understand that this sim was delivered in beta stage, witha lot of bug, things to be developed, etc. And need some time reading forums to make some minor tweaks.

Put only blame devs are easier. That's why I say: go buy consoles!
well i partially agree with you.i for instance have a absolute clean install of cod.not changed anything in the conf.ini file,i do clean the cache before every beta patch install, and i deleted the ubi logo.yes deleting the ubi logo works for me.
yes each patch has its improvements,...but i had better performance before the last official patch, and thats a fact.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.