Next patch info

[MadBlaster]

I'm not moaning and I still have interest in CLoD. Just don't understand how guys can blow off UP 3.0./1946 because of the CEM and DM in CLoD. I just don't get that. Sure it's more realistic, but not that much different. I have flown CLoD 109, so I'm not making this up out of thin air.

[JG52Krupi]

You couldn't have flown it for more than 2mins then.

The damage model blows 1946 out of the water around 10 times the number of components that are modelled in 1946 and the sane for cem. I could take off in 2 seconds in 1946 and not have to worry about anything until the temperature warning came up. In cod the first few times I took off I would soon find myself juddering towards Dover and have to turn back before my engine failed. By the end of my time playing 1946 I had turned from a wonder woman flyer to a cockpit on only, but I was not expecting to have to keep my eyes on so many more dials than we currently do.

Now its easy to keep an eye on the cem but I am still learning about the new fm.

As someone said before if you fly wonder women view and little cem 1946 has more content but if your a full cem guy then you won't be able to go back to 1946.

[klem]

Originally Posted by MadBlaster

I'm not moaning and I still have interest in CLoD. Just don't understand how guys can blow off UP 3.0./1946 because of the CEM and DM in CLoD. I just don't get that. Sure it's more realistic, but not that much different. I have flown CLoD 109, so I'm not making this up out of thin air.

..... because I find CoD a more rewarding experience. There are two major bugs for me, lost sound and disconnecting servers but for me its still a better flying experience. I went back into IL-2 last week and it just isn't the same to me.

But as I said, if you prefer IL-2 then fly it and perhaps wait until SoW (remember the 'SoW' concept?) has more to offer you.