BF109 - Can't we just have the gunsight in the middle?

[335th_GRAthos]

+1 give us our old IL2FB gunsight view and stop this kind of sadistic experiments!

I use TrackIR 3 without 6DOF, if my problem is solved by buying TR5 (or my installing 6DOF) then this is crap, just fix the frigging thing and do not make me go to the computer shop to buy hardware in order to fix my problem...

~S~

Yes, they should fix it. They did so many things correctly but unfortunately not this one.

My fear is that they fear that if they implemented the gunsight as Lixma presented which would be correct, many people would not understand why it has to be this way and then spam the forum with their complaints about "unrealistic" gunsight even though it would be more realistic than what we have

[Ivan Fooker]

But at the end it is a game, which is considered to be a simulation.
That means a game like this should try to hit the thin line between a real simulation and a game...at the end we all playing this for fun.

If players, me aswell having trouble to get a target correctly into the revi, and start getting frustzrated about it,...and i guess that point is already reached for some...,a game dev should really seriously think about to add an option like we had in Il2-1946 (shift+F1).
Add it to the "Realism Option" or whatever but pls dont make the players suffer under it.
TrackIR is a great software/hardware,but it shouldnt be a requirement to fly that game properly.

The seatbelt option is just useless, as u cant follow your oponent and it is by very far unrealistic.

So yes, pls add or substitute the classic shift+F1 (Il2-1946') gunsight view.