200FPS in COD yes it is possible

[naz]

Thanks guys. The way the track played on your machines makes total sense, and the relative stable FPS is how it plays in Pseduo mode for me too.

I guess CloD in Full screen mode is just guiving me some helpful "life coaching" ... dont look over your shoulder

Thanks for taking a look
S!

[FS~Phat]

Here's some updated system pics for the beast that get 200FPS out of COD on high at 1920x1080.

I just need to get some Aquacomputer Blue UV additive for the loop to finish the loops and then start buying sleeving stuff to sort the cables.
The left Res is more UV reactant because the loop was running TT UV green and obviously didnt flush as well or maybe even stained the perspex.

[335th_GRAthos]

Hmmmm.... did I say I like this rig? No, I was wrong!



I love it !





The only thing I just realised is that I am still with wife 1.0 and it seems to require a major upgrade in order to lay my hands on such HW... ROFL

Honestly I like it, it is the second best thing to look at in this forum while waiting for the 3Gb VRAM cards to come in the market (because anything less will not help us...)



~S~

[FS~Phat]

Originally Posted by 335th_GRAthos

Hmmmm.... did I say I like this rig? No, I was wrong!



I love it !





The only thing I just realised is that I am still with wife 1.0 and it seems to require a major upgrade in order to lay my hands on such HW... ROFL

Honestly I like it, it is the second best thing to look at in this forum while waiting for the 3Gb VRAM cards to come in the market (because anything less will not help us...)



~S~

Agreed you might need to upgrade to a compatible wife to be able run a system like this. I went through all hell with wife 1.0, 2.0, beta wife 3.0 and now running wife 4.0 before I got to a stable gaming platform.

[roadczar]

Originally Posted by Formula88

To the OP: Who cares?! Whilst you are wasting time trying to get 201 FPS out of this sim I will be flying it and learning the aircraft subtleties. Wether its 35 or 350 FPS you arent going to notice the difference, no matter how much money you waste on massively over-built PC's it wont make you better at the sim. Maybe some specific body parts on the OP are just that small, the computer takes some attention from that I suppose. Anyways, just remember, regardless of the amount of wasted time and money thrown into that monstrosity it wont make you a better pilot and you wont stand a chance when we meet in the air.

There isnt a game in the world that needs that much hardware to run properly... I havent found anything my system cant run and its far from top of the line. This thread is almost as pointless as a raaaid thread...

There is always one in the crowd...

[naz]

"The lady doth protest too much, methinks"...

[FS~Phat]

Originally Posted by Formula88

To the OP: Who cares?! Whilst you are wasting time trying to get 201 FPS out of this sim I will be flying it and learning the aircraft subtleties. Wether its 35 or 350 FPS you arent going to notice the difference, no matter how much money you waste on massively over-built PC's it wont make you better at the sim. Maybe some specific body parts on the OP are just that small, the computer takes some attention from that I suppose. Anyways, just remember, regardless of the amount of wasted time and money thrown into that monstrosity it wont make you a better pilot and you wont stand a chance when we meet in the air.

There isnt a game in the world that needs that much hardware to run properly... I havent found anything my system cant run and its far from top of the line. This thread is almost as pointless as a raaaid thread...

Im sharing my passion, and I know others appreciate it even if you dont.
BTW, them are fight'n words... good luck getting me in the skies, Im a 10 year veteran of IL2 and 15+ years in combat sims. I'm not too shabby with a snapshot or turn and burn, just ask my squad mates. So watch your 6 buddy

As I have said previously in my post, if you dont have the advantage of higher FPS you wont know what your missing and it is definitely noticeable in how it smooths out overall gameplay and panning while using track-ir.

Finally, there are plenty of games out there that utilise this amount of computing power to the max. COD is obviously one of them. Then there's Metro 2033, Crysis 2, Stalker, Arma 2, ROF and others... need i go on?

[FS~Phat]

Originally Posted by Formula88

Congrats, should be a good fight considering I have all of the Il2 experience and more than 15 years of sim flying experience. As for those games you listed, my system runs them all just great except for Crysis2. I wouldnt play that garbage if they payed me. If you really think you have what it takes I am usually in the Repka 1 server with at least a 5-1 K/D ratio, and regularly take on 2+ 109's at a time and come out on top. Come and say hello, I'll give you a sweet goodbye My callsign in CoD is =US=Hell4Hitler, know it and fear it.

Only 2 109's? Pff... LOL ive taken on 4 on my own, killed 3 and wounded 1 on my own in a full-real DF server and still got home safely without a scratch on many occassion. and thats without boom n zoom tactics. Still though... cant do that all the time as the SA is pretty intense with more than 3. Its a great sense of accomplishment when you do it though!

cheers and see you in the skies my friend!

[FS~Phat]

Tonight I have the X52 throttle now mounted to a camera tripod and I rest the joy stick on a mouse mat sitting on the computer when I wheel it out from the desk.
Photo to follow.

Here's the latest pics with joystick throttle on tripod.

[ATAG_Doc]

Haha a wife. What do you get out of one of these? lol Life is grand when you're able to be as selfish as you want to be.