Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-06-2011, 09:10 PM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by raaaid View Post
yes i try to keep on topic( talk about the game) and never be rude however much im attacked

but some would report a post just by saying a 109 can out turn a spit

check that vid i out turn a gladiator online with a 1 i 185

the trick is turning going up and handle better energy

edit:

i see bnz dislike kill un unaware prey

bnzers put 2km tags intead of 5km to favour them in old il2

this game favours dogfight being so difficult to shoot

so i can get an adrenaline boost turning with a 109

but will it get ruined cause nay sayrs say a 109 cant out turn a spit?

people try to inlfunce the game into their way

so do i

ill try to behave but i bet this comment is disliked by some

i like a joust just of circlse where superior forces decide whos right bnz doesnt do that tnb does

Why are you so obsessed with the 109 out turning a spit thing anyway.........nobody denies it can be done in the game by a human against AI or a lesser human, but the reality was that a spit could out turn a 109, it was one of the only major advantages the spit had.....but you seem to wan't to poke at this particular topic in order to get a reaction.......you are an attention seeker and like a bit of controversy.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-06-2011, 10:00 PM
raaaid's Avatar
raaaid raaaid is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,329
Default

because i have the feeling thought both planes are equal turners peoples gonna complain if an spit deosnt out turn a 109 in a dime

for me the game is boring if its bnz against tnb

id like planes so close in performance its up to the pilot as the game manual says

who flies the 109 in the old il2 online?

i dont want more of the same so i express my opinion
__________________
http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e222/raaaid/fmkld-1.jpg2.4ghz dual core cpu
3gb ram
ASUS Radeon EAH4650 DI - 1 GB GDDR2

I PREFER TO LOVE WITHOUT BEING LOVED THAT NOT LOVE AT ALL

Last edited by raaaid; 06-06-2011 at 10:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-06-2011, 10:08 PM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by raaaid View Post
because i have the feeling thought both planes are equal turners peoples gonna complain if an spit deosnt out turn a 109 in a dime

for me the game is boring if its bnz against tnb

id like planes so close in performance its up to the pilot as the game manual says

who flies the 109 in the old il2 online?
Where exactly does BnZ apply in this topic? why does the idea of a spit out turning a 109 = BnZ in your mind?

if you want equal performance then use equal aircraft i.e. 109 vs 109 or spit vs spit, the fact of the matter is different aircraft perform differently as do pilots.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-06-2011, 10:13 PM
raaaid's Avatar
raaaid raaaid is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,329
Default

yes but thats something promised in the manual, planes so close in performance is up to the pilot

i dont want the comunity to impose the idea that the 109 was a worse turner

if you research most agree its imposible to know which was really the better turner since it was pilto dependant

if this flollows il2 spits will use tnb and 109s bnz

all i ask is that the 109 turn as well as the spits because if not for me the game is boring

im not sure about the flight model yet, some times i out turn spits others they out turn me
__________________
http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e222/raaaid/fmkld-1.jpg2.4ghz dual core cpu
3gb ram
ASUS Radeon EAH4650 DI - 1 GB GDDR2

I PREFER TO LOVE WITHOUT BEING LOVED THAT NOT LOVE AT ALL
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-06-2011, 10:50 PM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

Well I want it to be accurate....that means the spit has an edge on turning ability.

this would mean:

spit+good pilot vs 109+good pilot = spit out turns 109
spit+bad pilot vs 109+bad pilot = spit out turns 109
spit+bad pilot vs 109+good pilot = 109 out turns spit ....etc etc


you need to remove your rose tinted glasses and realise that in war there was no room for chivalry, opposing forces would play on their own strengths and exploit the oppositions weaknesses to make life easier, why would anybody risk their life by picking a even fight, the point was to kill the enemy and get the hell out, that is also what 'most' people are trying to recreate in simulations, why don't you try to create your own online group who like to play in your own style......'raaaids magic pixie squadron'.....we like to fly in circles and not shoot because it's all about the 'beauty of the moment'

Last edited by bongodriver; 06-06-2011 at 11:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-06-2011, 10:53 PM
Strike Strike is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Norway
Posts: 684
Default

I think aerial chivalry mostly died somewhere around 1918
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-06-2011, 11:03 PM
Sternjaeger
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strike View Post
I think aerial chivalry mostly died somewhere around 1918
uhm, pretty much, it became the exception in WW2, surely not the rule..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.