Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > IL2 Mods, discussion and links

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-05-2011, 02:02 PM
II/JG54_Emil II/JG54_Emil is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 208
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JtD View Post
According to Focke Wulf, the real 190 had a climb rate of 14 m/s in second charger gear.
According to 1C FM of that plane, it has 15 m/s.
According to a much improved mod pack FM, it has 17 m/s.
According to another even more improved mod pack FM, it has 18 m/s.

Go figure what "better" FM means...my guess is the next "improvement" will break the 20.

Maybe the FM builders should get together and check their data before they release it? Would save us from forum hostilities and bad FMs.

lol
what a indifferent comment all, all FW190 have a climb rate of 14m/s.???
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-05-2011, 03:02 PM
JtD JtD is offline
Il-2 enthusiast & Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 903
Default

Well, some lol, others will find the variant I was referring to.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-10-2011, 10:25 AM
Aracno Aracno is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 37
Default

About FW A6 wrong performance and the graphic showed in this thread, in the IL2 compare for some strange reason the AC weight is 3780 kg instead of 4050-4100, so il2 compare are calculating wrong ROC and performance due to this problem.
But AC weight in HFSX is correct and performance too.
So all this discussion was based on wrong calculations of IL2 Compare, not on the real ingame FM.
The same problem is present in others AC (wrong weight in IL2Compare), and they are studying the reasons of this error.
If this discussion was made ​​on the forum HFSX the problem would be solved immediately, without shedding doubt on the validity of the work done by Aachen.

Last edited by Aracno; 06-10-2011 at 11:10 AM. Reason: wrong spelling
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-10-2011, 10:27 AM
II/JG54_Emil II/JG54_Emil is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 208
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aracno View Post
If this discussion was made ​​on the forum HFSX the problem would be solved immediately, without shedding doubt on the validity of the work done by Aachen.
I absolutely agree.

Which leads us to the question why do we have such a discussion here?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-29-2011, 03:07 AM
439th_Spider 439th_Spider is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1
Default

You know what, this mod war goes nowhere and is non productive.
Since it began we had less and less people flying mods in Hyperlobby almost all coop start with 4.101

Not that it's not good but it's just not enough when you used to mods

Ace of Aces because of your behavior i restart flying UP instead of HSFX, if HSFX is so good no need to compare or bashing Ultrapack 3.0

I was suprise by HSFX 5.0 and i found it stable and fun to fly, why in that case bashing Ultrapack team, you surely had personal reason for doing it but you can KEEP IT FOR YOURSELF!

You use forums to settle your personal affair and i am sure other people are bored to see you continue to argue about your point of view, i don't see why people had to give answer to your thread, useless, as you always say you are right.

I will give you my point of view, go on vacation for a while, a year or so could do the trick

Over an out, and be sure i won't read your anwer if you ever give me one, but you won't be able to retain yourself don't you?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.