![]() |
|
|||||||
| FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some real world results:
![]() There was no physical time limit on the use of 12lb boost, just a requirement to log the use and a suggestion that it be limited to 5 mins but some pilots used it for 30 mins. It did effect engine life but not severely, and later versions of the Merlin III on the Sea Hurricane were modded to allow 16lb boost and 1440hp, which was effective up to about 5500ft. Last edited by Seadog; 06-04-2011 at 07:57 PM. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
These are test results from 1939, showing that a Merlin III could be run for many hours at 12lb boost:
![]() In the above test a Hurricane was run at 4.25 and 12lb boost for 20min and 5min repeatedly and only terminated at 49.5 hours when a glycol leak developed, by which time the engine had been run for over 8 hours at 12lb boost. Last edited by Seadog; 06-05-2011 at 07:28 PM. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yeah I wonder why RR still state for the merlin XX perfs in 1941 the following (quote)
Max T.O 3000rpm + 12lb/sq.in boost (M.S only) Max climb 2650rpm + 9lb Max all out level 3000rpm + 9lb Max cruising 2650rpm +7b But certainly RR R&D dep didn't new all abt field's Merlin. Baahhh those stupid engineers ... |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Merlin XX played only a small part in the BofB, but it was approved for 12lb boost during emergencies in Nov 1940:
![]() and, since 12lb boost was available during TO right from its introduction, any pilot, at his discretion could use 12lb boost at any time or any altitude where it was possible, and there was no physical lockouts in the cockpit engine management system to prevent a pilot from doing this. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lol
- The XX was a post BoB product hence as a fighter eng it shld hve beneficed of the former improvements - If 12lb MS is indicated it EXCLUDE any use of this level of boost above s/c alt Sry but your statement does not match any engineering rules and is contradicted by the submitted text. Let me explain : Supercharging put strain on your eng (300HP at recovering s/c alt) If at low alt a boost level is restricted it certainly can't be achieved at alt !! To give an exemple, my car has a turbocharger at 1.4 bar of boost (nearly 1.4 atm) I once had a friendly race against a motorbike in a mountainous road from 1K up to 3K meters. My boost is electronically regulated. My turbo s/c is capable of much higher boost value to be reliable in a series car. The higher we went the better was my engine against the motorbike naturally aspirated engine (same boost same HP for me- Lowering boost for him) up to the point that my 1.4t cars "matched" his much lighter vehicle. BUT the temp went to high as did the strain and (hopefully) the electronic module give it away before I blew the eng. That's what you risk with super/turbo charging. The lower the outside pressure is, the more the strain on the engine (mechanical or thermal respectively) will be. If a limit is settled at low alt, it means that it can't be superseeded at high alt otherwise the limit would be put at s/c alt (but as it was difficult to have accurate pressure measurement at alt in a moving ac at the time they might have choose to rely on a low alt limit). Baaah forget it I know that I am certainly loosing time writing this |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The text specifically allows 12lb boost in M gear for short periods of time during combat and during TO. It states the the boost override will provide 12lb boost up to 8500 ft after which it will gradually decline (to 9lbs at about 13000 ft): Quote:
However, as I've stated there is no physical interlock preventing a pilot from using the boost override in S gear, and using the Boost Override in S gear will provide additional power up to about 19000ft. Yes, this is an overload on the engine and cooling system but every pilot flying a Hurricane II always had the option to engage the boost override at any altitude and in either M or S gear. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think that getting near-unlimited use of war emergency power settings should only be allowed if
1) we are forced to fly with the same virtual aircraft, damage carrying over between missions and so on: i push it on one sortie, i do it on the next, i keep doing the same thing, it dies on me mid-channel on the 10th sortie or so...happy swimming back to Dover 2) this also applies to multiplayer along with an incentive to keep our aircraft alive (the usual IL2 server conditions where losing all your aircraft means you lose the mission, along with public stat-tracking so that everyone on the server can see who's the points maniac that's depleting all the team's aircraft), instead of having everyone over-boosting and "recycling" them by deliberately crash-landing worn-out airframes 3) it applies to all aircraft, 109s running a constant 1.45 Ata for example and then we have IL2:1946 all over again |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
For example: 16 February 1940 Operational conversion to the modification ![]() 20 March 1940 Publication of the modification ![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|