Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > Controls threads

Controls threads Everything about controls in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-03-2011, 11:39 AM
IvanK IvanK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 886
Default

Snip from Blackdog_Kt's post above:

"First it was the mechanical tachometers and the negative G cut-out in the Spit and Hurri, developers caved in to pressure from a number of people and changed them for everyone instead of making them optional."

Apologies for the thread drift but just a point of order and to set the record straight on the above snippet.

The Negative G cutout was exhaustively researched and proven too sensitive. Research involved discussion with 2 current UK early model Spitfire pilots and a visit to the National Archives (one of many). The attached jpgs from a UK Archive document on the matter. As can be seen in the archive document the measured critical value is +0.1G i.e. a reduction of 0.9G from 1G flight, this from instrumented aircraft looking into this issue.





With respect the "Mechanical tachos" and needle bounce. The RPM fluctuations initially shown bore no resemblance to the real case with respect to the RR Merlin... though for a poorly maintained M14P engine might have some truth . What we see now is pretty close to the mark. How do we know that ? Discussion with a couple of current Spitfire pilots flying RR Merlin Spitfires (one a personal friend who flies both RR and Packard spits). (Packard Merlins have Electrical tachos whilst RR Merlins have mechanical). A commercialy available DVD that has a MKII Spit performing a complete display with a lot of really good cockpit footage with the tacho clearly visible. In addition discussion with two current maintenance chiefs for two well known Spitfire operators. All of these discussions came out with the same thing ... pretty much rock steady RPM indications.

Things wernt/arnt changed on a whim but based on the best level of information that can be found.

Last edited by IvanK; 06-03-2011 at 12:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-03-2011, 04:58 PM
Blackdog_kt Blackdog_kt is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,715
Default

Disregard my previous example then, i guess you get what i'm trying to say anyway.

I'm more than happy to be corrected if it means we're getting an accurate sim.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-03-2011, 05:53 PM
335th_GRAthos 335th_GRAthos is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,240
Default

thanks for sharing this IvanK !
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-03-2011, 10:04 PM
IvanK IvanK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 886
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackdog_kt View Post
Disregard my previous example then, i guess you get what i'm trying to say anyway.

I'm more than happy to be corrected if it means we're getting an accurate sim.
yep I know exactly what your saying and I agree
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.