Just imagine CloD with WoP map

[David Hayward]

Originally Posted by philip.ed

but that is not really the point, so the green-puke-filter rubbish is rather irrelevent.

It's completely relevant when it's causing your eyes to bleed. You might be able to ignore it, but I can't.

ok, im going to give you folks a WOP makeover. it wont be pretty though.

[philip.ed]

If your eyes are bleeding go to a hospital. TBH, I can't find any credibility in a poster's view, especially when it comes to the subject of visual aesthetics, when he is telling me his eyes are bleeding.

Here's some help for you; the filter does not affect the layout of the terrain. You, my dear sir, are just being childish. And you are what, 47 did you say? It's amazing how adults can act so childish.

And to add; yes, I agree that comparisons between CloD and WoP are largely irrelevent. Because WoP is modelling a lot less details than CloD is. The comparison over terrain layout is only to show that, even without 3-D hederows or the like, not much is needed to be well on the way to make the CloD landscape look more like England.

[David Hayward]

Originally Posted by philip.ed

And to add; yes, I agree that comparisons between CloD and WoP are largely irrelevent. Because WoP is modelling a lot less details than CloD is.

Then why do you keep doing it? CoD looks better by a very large margin. There might be a few small details that WoP gets better because it's map is much, much smaller, but, overall, CoD crushes WoP like a little ugly bug.

[kendo65]

David, you are really not listening to or taking on board anything that anyone is saying. The specific point we are making about one feature of WOP has been made many times now in this thread. You keep arguing about something else despite being told that most people already agree with your point (the green thing!)

We get your position, but there comes a point where it is wise to just 'agree to disagree' with what others are saying, otherwise this thing will degenerate into :

"Oh yes it is..."
"Oh no it isn't...", etc , etc

[David Hayward]

Originally Posted by kendo65

David, you are really not listening to or taking on board anything that anyone is saying. The specific point we are making about one feature of WOP has been made many times now in this thread. You keep arguing about something else despite being told that most people already agree with your point (the green thing!)

Sorry, but you're doing the exact same thing. You're ignoring the green puke and tiny map size and zooming in on some small detail of WoP that you like better than CoD. When you compare the overall look, including the green puke, CoD blows WoP away. It's not even a close call.

[philip.ed]

Originally Posted by David Hayward

Sorry, but you're doing the exact same thing. You're ignoring the green puke and tiny map size and zooming in on some small detail of WoP that you like better than CoD. When you compare the overall look, including the green puke, CoD blows WoP away. It's not even a close call.

No, we all agree on that
We are all talking about the layout of the terrain, and were doing so before you trolled in here.

[David Hayward]

Originally Posted by philip.ed

No, we all agree on that
We are all talking about the layout of the terrain, and were doing so before you trolled in here.

WoP has a tiny map. Comparing layout is utterly ridiculous. Besides, the photos show the CoD layout looks as good as the WoP layout.

[kendo65]

Originally Posted by David Hayward

Sorry, but you're doing the exact same thing. You're ignoring the green puke and tiny map size and zooming in on some small detail of WoP that you like better than CoD. When you compare the overall look, including the green puke, CoD blows WoP away. It's not even a close call.

No. I'm not ignoring those issues. I've already said that I agree with you about them.

You're right that I/we are picking out one specific detail of WOP - that is the whole point of this thread. That one specific detail that some of us feel WOP does well and where COD could be improved if it did something similar.

[David Hayward]

Originally Posted by kendo65

You're right that I/we are picking out one specific detail of WOP - that is the whole point of this thread. That one specific detail that some of us feel WOP does well and where COD could be improved if it did something similar.

Judging from the screenshots that were recently posted the only thing WoP gets better than CoD is the color of the trees. I really don't see how you could find the WoP terrain layout to be better. I'm not saying this to be difficult. I really don't see what you are seeing.