Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > Controls threads

Controls threads Everything about controls in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-23-2011, 02:59 PM
IvanK IvanK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 886
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG53Frankyboy View Post
in this book
http://www.amazon.de/gp/product/imag...299956&s=books

a speed of 3° per second is giving for a VDM propeller.
So, as one hour on the gauge is showing a difference of 6° of propellerpitch change , with the actuel speed of ~16sec for one hour , CoD is to slow indeed.

CoD = 6° in 16sec
real (according to linked book)= 6° in 2 sec

Which VDM propeller and in which aircraft ? Fw190 kommandgerate operation has a different pitch slew rate to the DB system that lacks kommandgerate.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-23-2011, 06:15 PM
JG53Frankyboy JG53Frankyboy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,162
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IvanK View Post
Which VDM propeller and in which aircraft ? Fw190 kommandgerate operation has a different pitch slew rate to the DB system that lacks kommandgerate.
i dont know. And wondering why the electric system of a VDM should work in different speeds with a BMW or DB601.

Anyway, if you choose 1° , 3° or something between per second, all is better than this 0,3...°
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-24-2011, 12:45 AM
IvanK IvanK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 886
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG53Frankyboy View Post
i dont know. And wondering why the electric system of a VDM should work in different speeds with a BMW or DB601.

Anyway, if you choose 1° , 3° or something between per second, all is better than this 0,3...°
Because the FW190 system was a far more spophisticated system than that used in the BF109. There was no Kommandgerate system on the 109. I am away from some BMW801 refrences at the moment. In those refrences are some BMW801 Prop pitch slew rates. Once I find them I will post.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-24-2011, 08:49 AM
Kurfürst Kurfürst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IvanK View Post
Because the FW190 system was a far more spophisticated system than that used in the BF109. There was no Kommandgerate system on the 109. I am away from some BMW801 refrences at the moment. In those refrences are some BMW801 Prop pitch slew rates. Once I find them I will post.
The speed of propeller angle change is a function of the speed/torque of the electric motor that drives it, not wheter the constant speed govenor system wassophisticated or not..

Currently, from what I've seen in the forums I see the the following problems with Bf 109E propeller pitch control:

1, As per Luthier's newest patch log, the 109E-3 changed propeller cannot be feathered.. silly. The December 1939 109E pilot manual instructs the pilot to use "Segelstellung", ie. "Sailing Position" = feathered propeller position. The 109E could be fully feathered!!

2, The instument board pp. change lever has labels and positions for groBer and kleiner Drehzahl (increase/decrease rpm) settings but the real one had an extra bottom position: Segelstellung. This was fixed, ie. the lever stayed there and keep the propeller in feathered position when set, explicetely for the purpose of freeing him from the burden of having the keep pressing the lever all the time1!

3, Appearantly something also went wrong with the propellor pitch change speed and it is now 0.3 deg/sec.. bah. The documented figure is about 1 deg/sec.


In short what needs to be fixed:

1, (re-)Adding a fully featherable propellor and key binding for it on the 109E series, plus graphical rework of the dashboard prop pitch lever.
2, Fixing the propellor pitch speed change which became abnormally low.
__________________
Il-2Bugtracker: Feature #200: Missing 100 octane subtypes of Bf 109E and Bf 110C http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/200
Il-2Bugtracker: Bug #415: Spitfire Mk I, Ia, and Mk II: Stability and Control http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/415

Kurfürst - Your resource site on Bf 109 performance! http://kurfurst.org
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-24-2011, 12:25 PM
VO101_Tom's Avatar
VO101_Tom VO101_Tom is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 799
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurfürst View Post
...

1, (re-)Adding a fully featherable propellor and key binding for it on the 109E series, plus graphical rework of the dashboard prop pitch lever.
....
Hali. Már én is beraktam ide korábban erről infót, hogy három helyett négy állású lenne a légcsavar állásszög állító kapcsoló, de nem igazán foglalkoztak vele (és a középállás is szar helyen van emiatt jelenleg):

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...6&postcount=29

Nem baj, minél többször látják, talán valakinek eszébe jut kicserélni.
__________________
| AFBs of CloD 2[/URL] |www.pumaszallas.hu

i7 7700K 4.8GHz, 32GB Ram 3GHz, MSI GTX 1070 8GB, 27' 1920x1080, W10/64, TrackIR 4Pro, G940
Cliffs of Dover Bugtracker site: share and vote issues here
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-24-2011, 07:16 PM
Absolut Absolut is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 25
Default

realistic or non realistic...blablabla , is its realistic that my reargunner can only shot when not moving, is it realistic that we all fly with no antropomorph, is it realistic that i alwaysm lost sound , is it realistic that the bombs now droping like darts, is it realistic that i can bail out under a second in any position, is it realistic...blablabla.
i payed 69euros, and i play a well made accurate game that impressed with its option to set.(now a lot of them works well)
But i do not accept that some tolds thats realistic and dont talk about put any option for it, after i played it for a long time now.
OK, im seriously playing since the begining of il2, i never had to be posting like this, but someone brutaly handed with my messerschmitt 109, its no virgin any more.
Gentleman is that the way u give us performance?




no more propitch on this controls, is that ok?
im not amused any more, to spend time to fly my 109, its urs.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-24-2011, 11:54 PM
IvanK IvanK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 886
Default

"2, The instument board pp. change lever has labels and positions for groBer and kleiner Drehzahl (increase/decrease rpm) settings but the real one had an extra bottom position: Segelstellung. This was fixed, ie. the lever stayed there and keep the propeller in feathered position when set, explicetely for the purpose of freeing him from the burden of having the keep pressing the lever all the time1!"

And the Devs were made aware of precisely this a while ago ... so hopefully a further fix will ensue.

Mind you I cant think of too many occasions when you would want to feather a prop in a single engine aeroplane. Perhaps in the case of a failed engine and you are trying to minimise drag to increase your gliding range.

Last edited by IvanK; 05-25-2011 at 12:10 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-25-2011, 03:45 AM
Blackdog_kt Blackdog_kt is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,715
Default

You're probably correct.
If you've seen a picture of the actual instrument there's a detent on the lower position to keep the switch there, probably so that the pilot doesn't have to manually hold it there and fight the spring-loaded return to center while it feathers.

On the other hand, it could also be that the detent enables an extended range of motion that's not available via the normal control range to prevent accidental feathering in flight.

In any case the operation is similar from the pilot's point of view, it should pretty much work the way Kurfurst pointed out: spring loaded 3-way switch with a separate feathering detent, corrected rate of pitch change (it's too slow currently) and if i may add, solving the reversal issue (controls are backwards now).


Quote:
Originally Posted by Absolut View Post
realistic or non realistic...blablabla , is its realistic that my reargunner can only shot when not moving, is it realistic that we all fly with no antropomorph, is it realistic that i alwaysm lost sound , is it realistic that the bombs now droping like darts, is it realistic that i can bail out under a second in any position, is it realistic...blablabla.
i payed 69euros, and i play a well made accurate game that impressed with its option to set.(now a lot of them works well)
But i do not accept that some tolds thats realistic and dont talk about put any option for it, after i played it for a long time now.
OK, im seriously playing since the begining of il2, i never had to be posting like this, but someone brutaly handed with my messerschmitt 109, its no virgin any more.
Gentleman is that the way u give us performance?




no more propitch on this controls, is that ok?
im not amused any more, to spend time to fly my 109, its urs.
You can still use your controls for prop pitch. There's a big zone that corresponds to each switch position so it's pretty easy to do.

If you move your slider up or down it's like holding the button in that position and pitch will change as long as you hold it there, return it to center when you reach your desired pitch and it will stay there.

And yes, it's actually more realistic this way.

No offence, but i think a lot of people carry their IL2:1946 habits with them and that's why they can't get to grips with how many of the controls work. I had some trouble too initially, but now that i understood how most of them work i find the new way of doing things much better than what we had. Real planes don't all have the same controls and it's good that this is reflected in the sim. Sure, there are bugs but patches are frequent and we're getting there.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-25-2011, 06:59 AM
Varrattu's Avatar
Varrattu Varrattu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 175
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IvanK View Post
Which VDM propeller and in which aircraft ? Fw190 kommandgerate operation has a different pitch slew rate to the DB system that lacks kommandgerate.
Maybe that the manual "D.(Luft)T. 3810 - VDM-Verstell-Luftschrauben Gerätehandbuch" can help us. But I didn't find anything of its content in open sources.

Regards Varrattu

PS: Have a look at this
http://www.enginehistory.org/Convent...20Electric.pdf

From the book, The Messerschmitt Bf.109 by James F. Craig.
"Another departure was the propeller pitch control, which was mounted near the centre of the instrument panel instead of on the throttle quadrant, and the prop pitch indicator, which was in the form of a clock face, complete with hour & minute hands. Blade angles of the VDM electric propeller, which were infinitely variable from a low pitch position of 22.5 degree to fully feathered 90 degree position, were read as clock settings. About ten minutes on the clock face was equivalent to one degree of propeller pitch."

Last edited by Varrattu; 05-25-2011 at 08:53 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.