Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > Performance threads

Performance threads All discussions about CoD performnce

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-17-2011, 05:09 PM
Flyby's Avatar
Flyby Flyby is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 701
Default

Thanks for the added replies, all. I've been out of the PC-building game for a while, but I know the i920 will reach at least 3.6 with air cooling and a good quality CPU cooler. It's a bit more work, as DoZeR says, but seems fairly do-able. I've though to sell it and buy an i2500K, just to more comfortably hit higher clocks. Plus, even when overclocking the 2500K, the power draw is substantially lower than the 920, not to mention that you can singularly focus on just overclocking the CPU. Apparently CLoD doesn't support or need hyperthreading either, and the 2500K doesn't have that feature. Too bad no crystal ball for what the future holds for gaming requirements, but if HT were to be a requirement, there's always the 2600K lurking. As I mentioned, the 920 has never been used, so maybe I'll find a buyer on the tech forums elsewhere.
thanks again!
Flyby out
__________________
the warrior creed: crap happens to the other guy!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-17-2011, 05:25 PM
l3uLLDoZeR l3uLLDoZeR is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 113
Default

You know whats up flyby...the 2500k is the best choice, low power and higher overclock. It's kinda something you have to choose which route to go.

Be warned microcenter sells the I7 960 for $199, thats gonna push the value of your "new" 920 down. Unless you plan on running more than 2 graphics cards the 2500k is the way to go!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-17-2011, 05:37 PM
MadTommy MadTommy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 493
Default

This is a post i made on the DSC forum...

Quote:
I'd thought i'd share some info for anyone interested or doubting the performance a modest overclock can give you.

I'm running a modest overclock, a dual core E8400. Default it runs at 3Ghz, 18 months ago i overclocked it to 3.6Ghz. Very stable, no overheating, no fancy cooling.

A few days ago my BIOS reset itself without myself noticing, and set it back to factory default. (removed the overclock). This coincided with the latest Warthog patch release. Installed the patch and was getting terrible performance. My fps had reduced by 50%. Naturally i initially thought it was the patch. I reduced graphics setting but it made no difference. I was now getting 15 fps dropping to 5 every now and again, when i had been always been between 25 - 60 fps.

I noticed my overclock had been removed.. reinstated it through my BIOS save setting feature and my fps increased by about 70%!!! I went from getting 15 to 45fps on the exact same mission! From a 0.6 Ghz increase!!

My cpu is my bottelneck but i was amazed, i had, to be honest, never realise what a boost it was giving me in A10c.

My rig for reference.
E8400 stock 3Ghz - overclocked to 3.6 Ghz.
GTX 480 (1.5GB)
4 GB Ram (1066)
x-fi extreme music
SSD HD

All game settings on High except Water & Traffic on Medium.

Getting overclocking people!!!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-17-2011, 07:03 PM
Urufu_Shinjiro's Avatar
Urufu_Shinjiro Urufu_Shinjiro is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 267
Default

One of the best places to lurk and learn about overclocking is at www.overclock.net.
__________________
CPU: Q6600 GO @3.6ghz
GPU: EVGA GTX570 SC
RAM: 2x2Gb DDR2 1066 4-4-4
HDD: 2x250Gb HDD RAID0
OS: Win7 Pro x64
Gear: TrackIR4 & G940
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-18-2011, 01:39 AM
Flyby's Avatar
Flyby Flyby is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 701
Default so true, Urufu

I last visited the site in July of last year. I'd forgotten about it! A great resource for sure.
Flyby out
__________________
the warrior creed: crap happens to the other guy!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-18-2011, 02:44 AM
Codex Codex is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hoppers Crossing, Vic, Australia
Posts: 624
Default

Well I used to "overcook"


Even with manufactures now engineering their hardware to perform at “overcooked” specs, they still won’t provide a warrantee if you do over clock them. Plus, I personally hate the smell of burning plastic in the house and the sight of smoke coming from by PC. I won’t do that again … LOL


I now religiously pay for the best performance rather than try and make a lower spec’d component perform at a higher specs.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-18-2011, 03:53 AM
louisv's Avatar
louisv louisv is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Montreal
Posts: 287
Default

I overclocked my quad core from 2.66 to 3.2 GHz and fps in FSX was boosted by the same proportions.

If the graphics card is the bottleneck, like in most non-sim games, it will not happen until you change the card.

Know your bottlenecks...
__________________
EVGA X58 FTW3 motherboard
Intel 980X CPU, not OC'd yet, 3.46 Mhz
Crucial Tracer memory 8-8-8-24 12GB
Crucial M4 256GB SSD, WD Raptor 600 GB hard disk
EVGA GTX580 graphics card
HP ZR24W Monitor 1900 X 1200 24"
Thrustmaster Warthog joystick
Saitek Combat rudder pedals
TrackIr 5
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-18-2011, 04:02 AM
AndyJWest AndyJWest is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,049
Default

Hopefully, I'll be able to find out for myself when the custom build from Scan I've ordered finally arrives: an i7/950 system, overclocked to 3.80GHz from 3.06GHz. If it doesn't make any noticeable difference, I'll probably turn the overclocking off. No point in toasting the system for a few FPS, and this beast is going to use quite enough power anyway.

(Incidentally, if anyone else is thinking of ordering a system from Scan, don't take their estimated delivery times too seriously - they seem to work on Oleg time, and '10 working days' seems to equal a month. I'd have been prepared to accept this anyway if they'd been more realistic, but it is irritating to have to be given overoptimistic estimates time and again.)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-25-2011, 06:30 PM
Urufu_Shinjiro's Avatar
Urufu_Shinjiro Urufu_Shinjiro is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Codex View Post
Well I used to "overcook"


Even with manufactures now engineering their hardware to perform at “overcooked” specs, they still won’t provide a warrantee if you do over clock them. Plus, I personally hate the smell of burning plastic in the house and the sight of smoke coming from by PC. I won’t do that again … LOL


I now religiously pay for the best performance rather than try and make a lower spec’d component perform at a higher specs.
I hope you don't take this the wrong way, as I'm honestly curious, how in the world do you fry a system while overclocking? I've been overclocking since the AMD Thoroughbred days and never myself or known anyone personally who has fried anything. What happened? What did you do, and did you find out where it went wrong?
__________________
CPU: Q6600 GO @3.6ghz
GPU: EVGA GTX570 SC
RAM: 2x2Gb DDR2 1066 4-4-4
HDD: 2x250Gb HDD RAID0
OS: Win7 Pro x64
Gear: TrackIR4 & G940
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-28-2011, 01:29 PM
Osprey's Avatar
Osprey Osprey is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gloucestershire, England
Posts: 1,264
Default

I bought my i5 2500K with the express desire to OC it. Haven't done it yet tho'
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.