Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > Performance threads

Performance threads All discussions about CoD performnce

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-11-2011, 03:52 PM
patrat1 patrat1 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 41
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vengeanze View Post
@Georgio41: you've got PM

@Winger:
I work with computers (PC). Have built PC's all my life. Got me an iMac three years ago.
Let me tell you, iMacs are stationary computer porn. It's actually a computer that looks good.
With the latest iMac I get hardware to run EVERY game out there on high or even ultra!
Sure, it costs but like I said, money is not an issue here...anymore.



if moneys not an issue, then you really should get a new desk.

im a pauper and i have a better desk than that.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-11-2011, 05:48 PM
Vengeanze Vengeanze is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 837
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by patrat1 View Post
if moneys not an issue, then you really should get a new desk.

im a pauper and i have a better desk than that.
hehe.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-13-2011, 08:03 AM
FlushMeister FlushMeister is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Sweden/Seattle
Posts: 57
Default

I'm sorry I dont think you'll be able to run CoD on the new iMac, I'm running t on a mac pro hexacore with a 5870 and it won't play it at 2560x1440, I use medium to high settings at 1600x900 and over london it's OK but wouldnt work at MAX, question is how much better the M6970 is compared to the 5870...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-11-2011, 02:26 AM
Nightmender Nightmender is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 3
Default

If your willing to shell out a lot of money, I'd recommend the Mac Pro ($2500). You can have up to 12 cores of power and comes standard with a 5x's faster graphics card. And if that's not enough, it's completly user friendly so you can upgrade it even more from there. You can install up to 512GB solid state drivers for ridiculous performance. It's industry standard, so I can guarantee that Clod will look AMAZING on it. It's a lot of money, but in the long run it will be worth it I think. I'm probably going to go this route too after I've saved up, and then run bootcamp with it. Good luck man, hope this helps
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-11-2011, 07:54 AM
Vengeanze Vengeanze is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 837
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightmender View Post
If your willing to shell out a lot of money, I'd recommend the Mac Pro ($2500). You can have up to 12 cores of power and comes standard with a 5x's faster graphics card. And if that's not enough, it's completly user friendly so you can upgrade it even more from there. You can install up to 512GB solid state drivers for ridiculous performance. It's industry standard, so I can guarantee that Clod will look AMAZING on it. It's a lot of money, but in the long run it will be worth it I think. I'm probably going to go this route too after I've saved up, and then run bootcamp with it. Good luck man, hope this helps
I'm a sucker for the iMac looks. Also, gettting a Mac Pro I could get the equivalens PC and mount in a pro chassi.

But now mac users don't have to worry about low end g-cards anymore. We got the thunderbolt.
Check this out:
http://www.sonnettech.com/news/nab2011/

Edit: Apparently PCI Express 2.1 x16 has a throughput at 500 MB/s per lane which means 500x16= 8 GB/s. Would mean that Thunderbolt would be a bottleneck at max 2 GB/s.
Well, tests and reviews will be interesting.

Last edited by Vengeanze; 05-11-2011 at 10:13 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-11-2011, 09:32 AM
RE77ACTION RE77ACTION is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 121
Default

Too bad this almost ended up in a Mac vs PC flame. There are valid reasons to choose for either of both systems. It completely depends on what type of user you are, your priorities and budget. And most clichés about both systems don't hold up anymore these days.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-14-2011, 01:43 AM
ktodack ktodack is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 24
Default

Cool, did you get your IMac new with the AMD Radeon HD 6970M 2 GB GDDR5 already installed? I have an IMac I7 with the Radion HD 5750 (1GB) and I don't recall having an option for the 6970. I'm still waiting until June for COD from Amazon. Can't wait to fly Spitfires looking at my 27" IMac screen.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-14-2011, 03:58 AM
Vengeanze Vengeanze is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 837
Default

@jzbdski: Thanks. Was planning on W7.


Quote:
Originally Posted by ktodack View Post
Cool, did you get your IMac new with the AMD Radeon HD 6970M 2 GB GDDR5 already installed? I have an IMac I7 with the Radion HD 5750 (1GB) and I don't recall having an option for the 6970. I'm still waiting until June for COD from Amazon. Can't wait to fly Spitfires looking at my 27" IMac screen.
Yeah, the 6970M 2GB was an option but only when ordering from apple's website ("Configurable to AMD Radeon HD 6970M with 2GB GDDR5, only at the Apple Online Store."). This is for the new mid 2011 iMac's.

Status is "Delivery 24th of Maj" but I know that they most often deliver much faster so hoping for next week.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.