Battle of Britain scenario vs sales ?

[No1 Cheese]

Originally Posted by Sauf

I undertand your thinking, but some other countries had been fighting the war for 2 years before America was involved, are we just to ignore that? TBH I couldnt give a flying f*#k if the pacific is ignored, apparently we aussies did stuff all there anyway! MacArthur was a turd and Blamey was his dung beetle and us Aussies suffered for it. Give me the Med anytime, pity Australia hasn't got the whining power of the USA.

Brilliant
I love the Aussies,fantastic bunch and bloody hard aswell.I had the chance of serving with a few and they was as good as i had always believed them to be!!!

HERE HERE

BoB is the perfect starting point as said the future releases will have us waiting in hopefully the right order.

Cheers

Cheese

[usr]

And do not forget the total lack of ground war in BoB. Perfect excuse to focus on the airborne side of things (seems to be hard enough) and not yet have a detailed dynamic campaign, elaborate ground AI and so on in the initial release.

That being said, the ironic side of me would not be fully surprised if finished, perfect ground war code for IL2-style close support missions would be sleeping inside CoD, just the kind of prioritisation mistake that would be totally 1C/MG-style

[Rattlehead]

Personally I'm up for it all.
North Africa for me is number one, but I'd be more than happy with whatever theatre is next.*
In the original Il-2, I loved Pacific Fighters, I loved the eastern front. I loved all of it, really.
Bring it on...

*With the possible exception of Korea. Not that I don't want to play Korea or fight in the Mig 15 or F-86, but it would seem strange going from BoB to many years forward and a totally different environment with totally different aircraft, and then later on back to WW2 for a stint in the Pacific or Russia.
In my opinion, it would totally break the 'flow' of the series.