![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Look at this. Not as rich in ground objects as CloD, but very nice nontheless. Great atmosphere.
Last edited by reflected; 05-02-2011 at 09:07 PM. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
@Reflected
I love RoF and am happy to play both that game and CoD, both for their own merits. CoD imo sure has come a long way since first release and so has RoF Peace. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
?
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
??
Why the questionmark? Reflected posted a RoF (Rise of Flight) screenshot and I gave my opinion about it. I think both RoF (Rise of Flight) and CoD (Cliffs of Dover) look good at portraying a believable landscape and are great sims in their own right and both have/will come a long way even more in the future. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
have you guys ever thought of this? right now, wouldn't it be great if we can run COD on WOP's graphics model, with COD's damage model and flight model of course.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't want CoD to use anything from WoP.
Last edited by David Hayward; 05-03-2011 at 01:46 AM. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
There are good and bad things about WoP graphically. The biggest plus for me is performance, I can run it with eyefinity. Bring that in to CoD and I'll be jumping around like a five year old on Christmas morning! Otherwise I'd take CoD over WoP any day, visually or otherwise. There's room for improvement though |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
yessssssssss.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
No thanks, I like to be able to see where I'm going.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|