![]() |
|
|||||||
| FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Impressive, thanks for the info!
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
However, Appendix VIII of the same book notes the Merlin IV as the lowest Mark number of Merlin designed for pressurised water cooling, and describes the Merlin XII as Quote:
Merlin III is listed as glycol cooled, as is Merlin V. However, in yet another list which forms part of the same appendix, Merlin V is given as "converted Merlin III" and as either pressure or glycol cooled. So, what I think was actually going on is this:
Note however, that this is nothing more than informed speculation. It is possible that the temperature reduction was independent of the change in coolant. However, my best guess would be that the original intention was to retain the 135ºC limit, but that the pressurisation required to prevent the system from boiling over was such that leaks became a problem (indeed, coolant leaks were quite well documented in this period) and therefore the degree of pressurisation and thus the maximum safe temperature was reduced at some point in order to mitigate the problem. Obviously the arguments for standardisation are pretty strong, so I imagine that once the decision was made to convert the installed fleet to pressurised water cooling with a 120ºC limit this new limit was imposed across the board irrespective of the progress of the conversion programme, resulting in the strange combination of pure glycol cooling and a 120ºC limit in some sources. BTW, the Spitfire I notes in the CE state that the limit is 120ºC and the coolant is 70% water and 30% glycol; but they state the engine as Merlin II or III not Merlin V. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi see here for manual download:
http://www.wargamespezia.org/downloa...ary-handbooks/ |
|
#4
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Operational Notes for Pilots on Merlin II and III. 2nd Edition January 1939 Quote:
2nd Edition October 1939, Reprinted 1939 Quote:
4th Edition, April 1940 Quote:
Quote:
Because it might be interesting, the Amendments to Air Publication 1590B Volume I states: Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes, and why in the simulation gauges boost max indicate +8Lb./Sq.in and the real Merlin XXII arrive to 12 Lb/Sq.in look here
http://www.spitfireperformance.com/spit1pn2-a.jpg
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bye now I have understand, it is a wronf oh the game, and also the gauges in the cockpit is wrong, see pictures on internet...
![]() ![]()
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|