Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-16-2011, 01:19 PM
Vengeanze Vengeanze is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 837
Default

I remember the Blitzpigs. A group of bigmouths. Dangerous pilots online though.
I'm SKULLS_Ven and worked as a moderator for a while in the Ubi forums.

Hamish, the forum works great at pointing out problems with the sim and even prioritize them. Just by looking at the subject field the devs can find out what needs to be fixed in what order. FFB seems to be on the top of the list right now.

+1 on benchmark mission like black death.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-16-2011, 02:02 PM
Feathered_IV's Avatar
Feathered_IV Feathered_IV is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,471
Default

Will we be exhorted to boycott the game on a regular basis? Seems to happen an awful lot with some of you guys when you don't get what you want.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-16-2011, 02:29 PM
whatnot whatnot is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 265
Default

Not too familiar with the EVE council, but what would definately bring added value would be a collective issue tracker where community could vote / prioritize issues.

This would hopefully reduce the million repeats 'Fix my thing asap pls!!!1'. Like FFB requests which are now spammed billion times to ensure devs see them and get a sense of urgency of the issue.

This way we would have community prioritized list which devs could easily review and make their decisions with atleast enough information.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-16-2011, 03:22 PM
baffa baffa is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 34
Default

Terrible idea, I suppose the OP wants to be one of the council members who want to decide what the community wants, and ultimatly what I want.
I have no idea who the blitzpigs are, maybe some elitist pigs who think they are better at filter all the "good" things better than everyone else.
Thanks but no thanks, I think I still want my direct contact with the devs on these forums, thank you.

PS.
I don't know what EvE online you are playing but I can bet my left arm that no council fixed my online experience in EvE lol. It's a just a PR stunt...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-16-2011, 03:39 PM
ElAurens's Avatar
ElAurens ElAurens is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Great Black Swamp of Ohio
Posts: 2,185
Default

Ham, I see where you are coming from here. Not sure a middle man is a good idea, but clearly we need a way to address issues without every thread turning into a shouting match, or devolve into Red vs. Blue drivel as some are doing already.

And I do agree that we don't want a repeat of what happened a lot in IL2 over the years. Plane Y behaves in a certain manner. After patch Plane Y behaves in a totally opposite manner. Wailing and gnashing of teeth ensues on forums, another patch is deployed, and Plane Y behaves in yet another totally different manner.

This destroys credibility for the developers FM/DM structure and hence the integrity of the sim as a whole comes into question.

The current questions of the RAF Merlin Neg G cutout is a fine example of the sim starting down the path that IL2 took. A small component of the Neg G behavior is not quite right, yet the devs take a sledgehammer approach, probably misreading the sentiment on the boards, and change the whole behavior instead of just tweaking the tiny bit of the behavior that is actually in question. Then it turns into an ugly Red vs. Blue thing and the threads devolve into school yard dust ups.

I hope my rambling makes sense.

Luthier cannot possibly parse this forum and still do the job he is getting paid for. The devs need some way to get info in a more easily understood manner.


O/T: Good to see you again Jimmy. Hope you are well.
__________________


Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943.
~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.