Poll for less-saturated colours

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

You misunderstood... I meant there is a difference in looking at a 35mm film shot and a digital shot which has been done using a poor gammut... this was not in relation to your presented image

yes, you could say what you will about filters and optics and I could say exactly the same to you and yours... but where is that going to get us?

if you think the bright green trees are accurate, that's for you... but there is image after image that will disagree with you and if you can't discern the difference between the ground and the trees in the shots, then you have something which needs sorting... unfortunately, defective colour vision can't be

No need to get personal, my colour vision is quite right me thinks. Your last line was well beyond acceptable.

[Wolf_Rider]

"if you think the bright green trees are accurate, that's for you... but there is image after image that will disagree with you and if you can't discern the difference between the ground and the trees in the shots, then you have something which needs sorting... unfortunately, defective colour vision can't be "