Merlin negative G cutout too quick?

[II/JG54_Emil]

lol

the weirdest comparissons are made in this thread to find arguments to convince the developers to tune the favorite plane.

If this happens for blue side I instantly see 10 posts calling s.o. Luftwhiner.

[609_Huetz]

Please get rid of the Blue v Red comparison for once... This thread is inteded to find out if a.) the devs did it right or b.) the devs got it wrong and it needs fixing.

Just like many others in here, I am under the impression that this is meant to be a Sim.

[II/JG54_Emil]

You can read some very bad comparisons in this thread.
My take on this is the attempt to improve the FM of a favored AC, no matter if the comparison relates or not.

Anyway I just had to smile.
Just ignore my post.

I´ll listen to what Sternjaeger has to say.

[Moggy]

Originally Posted by II/JG54_Emil

You can read some very bad comparisons in this thread.
My take on this is the attempt to improve the FM of a favored AC, no matter if the comparison relates or not.

Or to worsen the FM of a hated AC, in this case the door does swing both ways..but you are quite correct.

Nothing speaks louder more than documentational fact as opposed to opinion.

Originally Posted by Moggy

Or to worsen the FM of a hated AC, in this case the door does swing both ways..but you are quite correct.

Nothing speaks louder more than documentational fact as opposed to opinion.

yes and no... it depends on the nature of the documented fact and the opinion..

[rollnloop]

Beta patch seems to improve the cutouts. 0G<Instant G<1G = no cut out, instant G<0= cut out, as far as i can say without ingame gmeter.

[Moggy]

Originally Posted by Sternjaeger

yes and no... it depends on the nature of the documented fact and the opinion..

Oh absolutely it does, but having documentational evidence puts the ball squarely into the other court and says "there you go fella, let's see what you can do with that."

I think the RAF\Supermarine ran negative G tests sometime pre-war at Martlesham Heath or Boscombe down. I truly believe the answers lay there in those records.

Originally Posted by Moggy

Oh absolutely it does, but having documentational evidence puts the ball squarely into the other court and says "there you go fella, let's see what you can do with that."

I think the RAF\Supermarine ran negative G tests sometime pre-war at Martlesham Heath or Boscombe down. I truly believe the answers lay there in those records.

I still believe that better than papers and talk it's the real deal that solves any doubt. Even papers, made by men, could have been "retouched" in favour of this or that person/situation etc.. (think of aerial victories reports..),whilst first hand experience does hardly lie at all..

Having said this, it'd be interesting to read these records.