Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-26-2011, 01:06 AM
MadBlaster MadBlaster is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 666
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 15JG52_Brauer View Post
Personally I want to wait a bit and understand what exactly the problem is - ie how many fps loss does it cause, what do the before and after screenshots look like - what does the patch to remove the filter deliver before I make an INFORMED judgement about what to do. Right now it's rumour, heresay and no real facts - I'd like to see before and after screenshots, understand what it means to gameplay - and what on earth it means to future suport if I get a russian copy etc etc. Personally I hope we get a fixed western version - we may not even miss the high contrast stuff - until I see comparisons I cant make a rational choice anyway - just my 2 pence worth - but I trust 1 C to fix it in the end, and after 6 years I can wait a bit more. I hope SLI will get fixed - it must do or all other tiles from ubi will also be SLI handicapped and wont sell - cant believe it's just related to this 1 game. Anyway - just bought ROF - will enjoy that until this is fixed - which I'm sure it will be just not sure if it will be 2 weeks or more....

Well, for now you can look at the official 1C vids and compare to what guys from russian are putting out now. The performance difference seems huge imo. Also, the filter is not a rumor. Luther is the one who told us about it in the first place.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-26-2011, 01:42 AM
15JG52_Brauer 15JG52_Brauer is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 85
Default

well if lets say this problem happened with 1946, the devs would take a known performance benchmark ( ie black death) run it with and without filter, give us screenshots and framerates (say on a mid spec machine) so we can make informed judgements - so why cant they do that here - so we know what the issue is - if its a deal breaker or not? Too many variables with all the vids on you tube - you are not comparing apples with apples. I would like to see some real examples - directly comparable. It's not too much to ask, maybe 30 minutes or an hours work. If we don't see it, then maybe there is a problem they dont want to show, but I'd rather see it and understand if it will be a quick fix or not. Unless it is totally fubar I'm still buying it as I believe any problems will be fixed (been flying il2 since 2001) - but I just want information. Lack of information creates a vacuum where rumours and ill informed comment will kill this game... just my 2 pence(cents for the us guys) worth.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-26-2011, 01:52 AM
MadBlaster MadBlaster is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 666
Default

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=19487

Look at these videos that Nike-it posted with the retard filter in place. He has

high end machine. If you read that thread carefully, he implies that his machine

or a very similar machine was used for the 1C official company vidoes. I think

you will find a huge performance difference. For me, it is enough to say

something has to change. The retard filter has got to go. Avg. 30 fps on a high

end machine with mid-low settings??? Not good enough. Not good enough at

all imho.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-26-2011, 01:54 AM
15JG52_Brauer 15JG52_Brauer is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 85
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MadBlaster View Post
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=19487

Look at these videos that Nike-it posted with the retard filter in place. He has

high end machine. If you read that thread carefully, he implies that his machine

or a very similar machine was used for the 1C official company vidoes. I think

you will find a huge performance difference. For me, it is enough to say

something has to change. The retard filter has got to go. Avg. 30 fps on a high

end machine with mid-low settings??? Not good enough. Not good enough at

all imho.
agreed - which is why I want some numbers to back up what we are seeing from videos etc - then we can make real informed choices
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-26-2011, 01:59 AM
MadBlaster MadBlaster is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 666
Default

He gives the fps numbers in the thread. After you watch those, go here



then tell me you don't see one hell of a difference. No numbers needed really.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.