![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
if you know a little bit about Il2 history, you'll know why that isn't funny.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And I would like to know more about this Su26 story
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Holy crap! how many $%$&$%^ conspiracy theories can you guy's come up with in one day? I swear this community is like a bunch of teenage girls denied their cellphones.
__________________
I'm pretty much just here for comic relief. Q6600@3.02 GHz, 4gig DDR2, GTX470, Win7 64bit |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
+1 Also, blitzpig... You seem to be out every time il2 announces something bad. And yet you come back to complain. Why complain about something you aren't going to buy, why not just do us all a favour and find some other game to complain about. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
OK? And do us all a favor.
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() IMO, that is the plane I was looking forward the most.
__________________
LEVEL BOMBING MANUAL v2.0 | Dedicated Bomber Squadron 'MUSTANG' - compilation of online air victories |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Just because the Russians didn't get it,doesn't mean we won't!
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
my pick will have to wait until march 31st.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I guess having to wait until mid April in the Western Hemisphere is now not such a bad thing.
*sigh* I just don't want this to turn into the disappointment I had at the release of RoF, that's all I'm on about. Been looking forward to this for years, and now it just seems to be like sand slipping through our fingers...
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
If everything is sold separately, there's no common standard in the online community: two years down the line, there's people with all sorts of different flyables that can't fly some online mission because they don't have the necessary aircraft installed. I'd much rather pay $50 for a 10 aircraft expansion, even if i only use half of them on a regular basis, rather than have the same total price (ie, $5 per plane, 5x10=50) but with the planes sold individually. If i can buy them separately, i'll most probably buy only the 2-3 that i use the most and so will everyone else, which is what causes the multiplayer discrepancies in the long run. That's what made IL2 successful in multiplayer, most people had similar content in their games and everyone could join everything. Even with mods, there's some standards and versions. But when a game is cut down in small little pieces you lose all that. Imagine two years from now where the CoD series will have maybe 50 flyables in total, you join a server only to find out that every second or third mission is using aircraft that you haven't installed and so you have nothing to fly, even if you can still see them flown by the AI and other players. Then you have to wait it out or disconnect, join another server, rinse and repeat. It's cumbersome, annoying and almost classifies as sabotage to the success of multiplayer in the long run. There's a reason that there's more people flying IL2 multiplayer than other newer sims with itemized aircraft installations (from combat ones like RoF, to civilian ones like FSX): if we don't have the same content, we can't really fly in the same scenarios with ease. Another reason i dislike the piece by piece model is that it forces developers to only focus on flyable stuff, usually starting with the popular hot-rods. If this had happened with IL2 we wouldn't have all those wonderful "crap" planes today, the Gladiators, Avias and Fokkers, neither would we have so many different ground objects and ground units to select from. All we would have is 20 versions for each popular fighter and pretty much nothing of the rest, compared with what we have now. That's why a full expansion is always better: it allows the developer to sell the "supporting cast" (ground units, static objects, etc) that bring life to our ingame world along with the flyables that everyone seems to focus on. If on the other hand all they sell is single aircraft, then that's all they will focus on ![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|