Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-26-2011, 04:27 AM
salmo salmo is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 632
Default

I am in the nursing profession & have a special interst in this topic.

Luthier reports the game caused "wide-scale epilepsy failures when tested". This suggests a high incidence of photosensitive epilepsy (PSE) was encoutered amongst game beta-testers. In contrast, the incidence of PSE across Great Britain has been reported to be about 1.1 per 100,000 persons (0.0011%) [Quirk et.al. 1995].

The decision to impliment an "epilepsy filter" is presumably based upon Luthier's anecdotal observations, rather than the scientific evidence. The low incidence of PSE in the community does not seem to justify such a decision.

References
J. A. Quirk, D. R. Fish, S. J. M. Smith, J. W. A. S. Sander, S. D. Shorvon and P. J. Allen, Incidence of photosensitive epilepsy: a prospective national study. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
Volume 95, Issue 4, October 1995, Pages 260-267

Last edited by salmo; 03-26-2011 at 04:40 AM.
  #2  
Old 03-26-2011, 04:34 AM
fearlessfrog fearlessfrog is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 64
Default

I think it's a automated testing tool that is used, rather than incidents in the beta program. It's used in TV/games production to measure contrast changes and 'score' the result for problems or susceptibility.

Also, saying 'I don't have epilepsy, so why bother' is missing the point of the guideline, in that it was introduced after video games caused seizures in people who didn't previously show any symptom.

PS Not saying I agree with the use of this 'filter' but just trying to help with actual info.

Quote:
Originally Posted by salmo View Post
I am in the nursing profession & have a special interst in this topic.

Luther reports the game caused "wide-scale epilepsy failures when tested". This suggests a high incidence of photosensitive epilepsy (PSE) was encoutered amongst game beta-testers. In contrast, the incidence of PSE across Great Britain has been reported to be about 1.1 per 100,000 persons (0.0011%) [Quirk et.al. 1995].

!C's decision to impliment an "epilepsy filter" is presumably based upon Luther's anecdotal observations, rather than the scientific evidence. The low incidence of PSE in the community does not seem to justify such a decision.

References
J. A. Quirk, D. R. Fish, S. J. M. Smith, J. W. A. S. Sander, S. D. Shorvon and P. J. Allen, Incidence of photosensitive epilepsy: a prospective national study. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
Volume 95, Issue 4, October 1995, Pages 260-267
  #3  
Old 03-26-2011, 05:25 AM
Sauf Sauf is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 436
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fearlessfrog View Post
so, saying 'I don't have epilepsy, so why bother' is missing the point of the guideline, in that it was introduced after video games caused seizures in people who didn't previously show any symptom..

Well in that case I dont see what all the fuss is about, Just advertise it as:

"IL-2 Cliffs of Dover, comes with free epilepsy tester for you and your whole family at no extra cost!"

They really are dumb at ubi marketing, sheeesh.
  #4  
Old 03-26-2011, 09:20 AM
HundertneunGustav HundertneunGustav is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 90
Default

dont worry about epilepsy for me... if i can at some point get rid of it in some way, i will turn this epilepsy protection off. Bring on thebangs and lightnings, shockwaves and hazardeous flashes...
  #5  
Old 03-25-2011, 04:39 PM
Longy Longy is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 11
Default

Well good thing that you clarified. Looking forward to seeing the game being improved.
  #6  
Old 03-25-2011, 04:41 PM
Voyager's Avatar
Voyager Voyager is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 164
Default

I hate to say this, but that is actually rather fascinating. I wonder if this may end up being one of the long therm limitations of high levels of realism in computer games?
  #7  
Old 03-25-2011, 04:42 PM
Bwaze Bwaze is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 18
Default

I guessed there must be more to the story than it appeared from first posts. Will abstain from writing further arboreal posts and patiently await for the 31. March.

Hope you solve the issue.
  #8  
Old 03-25-2011, 04:47 PM
Storm of When Storm of When is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 93
Default

Thx for the information. I must say this is what you get in a world obsessed with health and safety, how many people with Epilepsy play flight sims and how many will play CoD....not many i`m guessing and for this small percentage of the community we all have to pay with no X-Fire or SLi, and lower framerates.

I`m diabetic so when i`m playing football I do so knowing i`ve got to eat a load of sugary stuff before I start playing it`s called common sense where i`m from, so if your unfortunate and suffer from epilepsy a flight sim with massive amounts of glints and flashes probably ain`t the greatest choice of game, i`m all for the option to enable by default an anti-epilepsy tool, with the option to turn it off for the people without. Placing these limitations on everyone is a major error, i`ll wait till it`s sorted before placing my order, i`ve cancelled the current one.

Maybe more info on the effects and frame loss rates would be a good move?/
  #9  
Old 03-25-2011, 04:49 PM
swiss swiss is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Zürich, Swiss Confederation
Posts: 2,266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Storm of When View Post
it`s called common sense where i`m from,

So you're from MARS?!

Or maybe, the past...
  #10  
Old 03-25-2011, 06:06 PM
nynek nynek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Vancouver B.C.
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swiss View Post
I'm willing to accept the risk and therefore want the original.

Where do I sign the waiver?
And that's the way to go. All today's soft needs some sort of "agreeing upon" in order to use it. Put ME back in charge of choosing my poison.

Last edited by nynek; 03-25-2011 at 06:11 PM.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.