![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Thanks for the detail. A pipe-smoker should have this info at his fingertips. As an ex-pipe smoker, the info has left mine. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think 75% quite reasonable.
Cheers Pete
__________________
Puffer_2 |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Let me start by saying that I am the chief mechanic for a small antique auto museum in the US. I've worked on a fair few MG T series cars.
Yup, it's nit picking time... The fenders (wings in Brit speak) on the TA are far too wide, as are the wheels and tyres. The TA through TC series MGs had very narrow 19" diameter wheels and tyres. Also that colour is more than a bit too bright for a 1930s/40s era MG. The Austin Seven is spot on however. (Worked on one of those as well, not many on our side of the pond though). Now what I'd like to see is a Triumph Gloria Southern Cross, as I'm a Triumph man myself (TR3).
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I always thought a "fender" was a mudguard. Never heard it called a "wing" - in UK or SA, but maybe I just don't get out enough
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
We have bonnet,wings,doors,boot,tailgate,bumper,headlights , tail lights,indicators,brake lights. How we can make something so simple so complicated |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Being a British car owner for almost 40 years I am quite familiar with the Queen's English versions of the bits of the automobile.
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Very true. Must have been a dodgy set of blueprints they worked from. This one is a lot better, IMO.
![]() To be found here: http://www.autosports-gallery.co.uk/...g-tc-1943.html |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
22 pages of mostly whining, and nobody mentioned that the Spitfire had a B/W belly? It has me tingeling all over! Does it come as a form of markings or as a skin? I'm really ecited about the possibilities!
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Sorry Zorin but I think your source (autosports-gallery.co) is more likely to be the dodgy one. The TC was not launched until 1945. So a blueprint showing a 1943 MG TC is bogus. Can't see a date on the "blueprint" so it may be that someone just guessed 1943. It is a fact that there was no motor car production for the civilian market during the war.
I have to agree with ElAurens that the wings are too wide and the green is much too bright, an MG TA in green would almost certainly have been British Racing Green (BRG). However I think the wheels are just about correct. Compare with this: ![]() Try this site for dates, production details etc for TA - TF: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MG_TB#TB As a matter of interest what is the US term for what we in the UK call a bumber? Regards Pete
__________________
Puffer_2 |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|