Freetrack interface use in IL-2:CoD

[Strike]

Why not just buy TIR 5?? It's the price of two PC games and will let you use it in nearly every flightsim there is + games like ARMA II and certain driving games/sims too.

I have had TIR 3, 4 and now 5 and I must say I am overall very very pleased with it. Definately worth the money. Also, it's very accurate and responsive, and with the track-clip pro with the IR diodes it just sticks to your headset and you can get rid of that silly cap :p

The only downside I can possibly think of with the TIR is that it doesn't like bright light sources, other IR devices or direct sunlight. Myself, I sit with my PC against the West so that in the afternoon I can get some direct sunlight in here from my 9 o Clock position. Even though, the biggest problem is being blinded by the sunlight myself, the Track IR rarely looses track

I paid a total of just under 200$ total to get it shipped to Norway, and it arrived within a week

[LoBiSoMeM]

Originally Posted by Strike

Why not just buy TIR 5?? It's the price of two PC games and will let you use it in nearly every flightsim there is + games like ARMA II and certain driving games/sims too.

I have had TIR 3, 4 and now 5 and I must say I am overall very very pleased with it. Definately worth the money. Also, it's very accurate and responsive, and with the track-clip pro with the IR diodes it just sticks to your headset and you can get rid of that silly cap :p

The only downside I can possibly think of with the TIR is that it doesn't like bright light sources, other IR devices or direct sunlight. Myself, I sit with my PC against the West so that in the afternoon I can get some direct sunlight in here from my 9 o Clock position. Even though, the biggest problem is being blinded by the sunlight myself, the Track IR rarely looses track

I paid a total of just under 200$ total to get it shipped to Norway, and it arrived within a week

Because I don't want.

Why not just you jump in front of a train? I believe it's because you don't want to do that...

[albx]

Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM

Because I don't want.

Why not just you jump in front of a train? I believe it's because you don't want to do that...

LOLLLLL

[Wolf_Rider]

I don't belive jumping in front of a train has anything whatsoever to do with headtracking, and basicaly was just a really silly thing to say.

[Strike]

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

I don't belive jumping in front of a train has anything whatsoever to do with headtracking, and basicaly was just a really silly thing to say.

I'm going to +1 that one. And pose the statement : Irrelevance?

[LoBiSoMeM]

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

I don't belive jumping in front of a train has anything whatsoever to do with headtracking, and basicaly was just a really silly thing to say.

Have EVERYTHING with headtracking, because is about OPTIONS!

If you two don't understand that, sorry. I like to have OPTION in my life, FREE CHOICES...

I don't want to buy a TiR. And someone maybe don't want to jump in front of a train. Options, choices...

And the "Strike" guy voted NO for support for FT. They don't understand that people MAYBE can make their own choices... I'm not surprised...

[Wolf_Rider]

mentioned many times Lobi... your poll was poorly worded and you were pegged as using it only to prove your position.

[LoBiSoMeM]

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

mentioned many times Lobi... your poll was poorly worded and you were pegged as using it only to prove your position.

Yes, it's "poorly worded", but we have 83% for FT use in IL-2:CoD, as usual...

I'm proving my position, loser!

[Strike]

Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM

Have EVERYTHING with headtracking, because is about OPTIONS!

If you two don't understand that, sorry. I like to have OPTION in my life, FREE CHOICES...

I don't want to buy a TiR. And someone maybe don't want to jump in front of a train. Options, choices...

And the "Strike" guy voted NO for support for FT. They don't understand that people MAYBE can make their own choices... I'm not surprised...

Ok analyzing...

"Have EVERYTHING with headtracking, because is about OPTIONS!"

Say what now? What/who HAS* everything with headtracking??? and the reason is about OPTIONS!"? nothing here makes sense!

next sentance:

"If you two don't understand that, sorry. I like to have OPTION in my life, FREE CHOICES..."

You are right, I don't understand a word of you, apology accepted! You like options? Well so do I, FREE CHOICES! is a part of living in a democratic society! This isn't North Korea (poor guys are probably not getting CoD). On the free choices topic, I like to choose between Mars and Snickers, I won't however, accept a free chocolate from a stranger, would you eat that?

Okay, further on:

"I don't want to buy a TiR. And someone maybe don't want to jump in front of a train. Options, choices..."

You are comparing buying track IR to commiting suicide. I can understand why you don't want to buy a track IR then. You should go look at www.naturalpoint.com and read the terms and restrictions etc. There is nothing there saying that if you purchase this product, you have to kill yourself. I choose Track IR, I am alive. (And happy with the product!)

And finally:

"And the "Strike" guy voted NO for support for FT. They don't understand that people MAYBE can make their own choices... I'm not surprised."

You are right, I voted no because I believe that Naturalpoint needs people to buy their products so that they can continue to Cooperate with the simulator developers and "tailor" the 6DOF experience together. Freetrack (to my knowledge) is a free "hack" that tries to simulate the inputs of "Track IR" by using your average webcam. I believe that freetrack is not accurate enough to produce the 6DOF experience we get with TrackIR and so I see no reason for game developers to use their time to add support for freetrack! TrackIR works GREAT with games that support this, but as far as goes for freetrack, I think it is better that the freetrack guys write their own stuff for IL-2: CoD and take responsability to make it compatible, rather than putting the work on Oleg. Just my opinion..

[LoBiSoMeM]

Originally Posted by Strike

You are right, I voted no because I believe that Naturalpoint needs people to buy their products so that they can continue to Cooperate with the simulator developers and "tailor" the 6DOF experience together. Freetrack (to my knowledge) is a free "hack" that tries to simulate the inputs of "Track IR" by using your average webcam. I believe that freetrack is not accurate enough to produce the 6DOF experience we get with TrackIR and so I see no reason for game developers to use their time to add support for freetrack! TrackIR works GREAT with games that support this, but as far as goes for freetrack, I think it is better that the freetrack guys write their own stuff for IL-2: CoD and take responsability to make it compatible, rather than putting the work on Oleg. Just my opinion..

I can see now that you are a complete ignorant about the subject. Why do you vote?