Head Tracking with Cliffs of Dover

[robtek]

Originally Posted by adonys

There you go, a direct link to a post of a developer stating another communication interface implementation was stopped at the express request of TrackIR. Which also implies that is might be a current policy of NP to ask simulation developers to only implement TIR interface into the engine.

THAT can be used to sue NP for unfair business competition.

iirc that was at the time when the alternative still included NP software.
The alternative changed that later in this form that then the, not prosecutable, user had to violate the copyright to gain access to titles without freetrack.dll.

[adonys]

bla-blaing around that FACT is only what it is: mindless mumbling. if that statement is true, and was made by a developer, then, I repeat, NP can be sued by anyone having interest in using a WR interface with that product, on the basis of unfair competition, no matter how many bla-blas will you throw in here on NP's behalf to cover it. just ask any lawyer you want for confirmation about this.

[robtek]

adonys, you have to quit on that selective reading.
I wrote: "iirc that was at the time when the alternative still included NP software."
FT was forced to remove the NP Software from its bundle. FACT
The only one who has difficulties understand short sentences and therefore is blah-blahing seems to be you.

[LoBiSoMeM]

Originally Posted by adonys

bla-blaing around that FACT is only what it is: mindless mumbling. if that statement is true, and was made by a developer, then, I repeat, NP can be sued by anyone having interest in using a WR interface with that product, on the basis of unfair competition, no matter how many bla-blas will you throw in here on NP's behalf to cover it. just ask any lawyer you want for confirmation about this.

It's a really important point. But the NP's fanboys/employees/trolls will say:

- Proof it!

We can just speculate why Oleg and team are so afraid to write a letter about the subject... NP is just a small company that helps people with disabilities... NP is like Mother Teresa of Calcutta!


Gimme a break...

[Wolf_Rider]

Originally Posted by adonys

bla-blaing around that FACT is only what it is: mindless mumbling. if that statement is true, and was made by a developer, then, I repeat, NP can be sued by anyone having interest in using a WR interface with that product, on the basis of unfair competition, no matter how many bla-blas will you throw in here on NP's behalf to cover it. just ask any lawyer you want for confirmation about this.

back to page (about) 5....

that would depend on how the interface was constructed, also your lawyer would ask; what proof have you?
Now what do you think the reaction would be?

Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM

Yes I have. If you are so stupid that can't understand, isn't my fault.

Everybody with a functional brain understood how FreeTrackClient.dll can provide HT data to any aplication.

You still stuck with "mouse look" and "hack". You even can't understand that. Sorry if you are that stupid, I can't do anything about that.

what, in the application receives the data??

[LoBiSoMeM]

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

what, in the application receives the data??

Whatever the software dev want. You can do anything with the provided data.

What's your stupid point now? You want that I describes how any game implement HT?

[Wolf_Rider]

Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM

You want that I describes how any game implement HT?

just ArmAII if you like

[LoBiSoMeM]

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

just ArmAII if you like

You talk like you know a lot. Talk about or go to hell. ASAP.

[swiss]

If it really was unfair competition, you would have to sue the devs, not NP.
Unless np forced them to remove the interface - and here we go, no one can prove.

Just out of curiosity, if CoD only supports TIR, what are you going to do, lobi?