Freetrack interface use in IL-2:CoD

[albx]

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

err, albx... I never that wasn't the code, I said it was a copy paste

(its not 100% bug free but at least it works

-updated the struct
-renamed FTReportID to FTReportName on line 93
-commented out the break in the loop, this allows the program to keep if for some reason the struct failed to update, so any program built off it should be error-tolerant)

is from the header




and I asked your pal to put into layman's terms how the FT worked, ie what did it hook into?

there? or i'm so stupid i can't read english because it's not my native language? or i missed some posts?

[Wolf_Rider]

are you sure you really want to go down this road, albx?



no, not "there"... do you know what the red highlighted section is?

[albx]

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

are you sure you really want to go down this road, albx?



no, not "there"... do you know what the red highlighted section is?

tell me, I'm sure i missed something... it's not your statement?

[Wolf_Rider]

err, (if you mean the section you highlighted) no

[albx]

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

err, (if you mean the section you highlighted) no

sorry, so who wrote it? I'm sure I missed something then

edit:
I found it, ok. I just copied and pasted the code from my sdk samples

[Wolf_Rider]

yes, you have...

the code you posted is a copy/ paste of text another copied from a post on another website...

neither you nor the other one can answer the question in layman's terms and choose to throw out smokescreens and stink bombs instead.

[albx]

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

yes, you have...

the code you posted is a copy/ paste of text another copied from a post on another website...

neither you nor the other one can answer the question in layman's terms and choose to throw out smokescreens and stink bombs instead.

what??? I copied and pasted the SOURCE CODE SAMPLE in MY SDK folder, not copied from another website, it's included in the FT files, so what exactly you wants to know? How freetrack send data to the DLL or what? be more precise
dmn in one post you seemed you understood, i was aware you copied a post from FT forum, now you again act like a dumbass... I'm tired...

[MadBlaster]

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

yes, you have...

the code you posted is a copy/ paste of text another copied from a post on another website...

Who is this person, "another"?

[MadBlaster]

Originally Posted by albx

there? or i'm so stupid i can't read english because it's not my native language? or i missed some posts?

Albx, watch your six in the future. This was a smoke bomb trap set up by the W-R.

Step 1) W-R sets up the trap by saying this C++ script is a "copy-paste" job to generate an expected reaction from you.

Step 2) W-R makes a few casual "programmer" type comments about the script to make you think he has some proof that it is a "copy-paste" job. As you see, I could not get a simple "yes/no" answer from him that these were his words. Instead, he tried to trick you into thinking they were a part of post #96 from that "other/another" poster when you called him out on them. Pretty sneaky crap going on here.

Step 3) W-R conveniently forgets to remind you that this script has probably gone through a few versions of Freetrack, leading you to possibly leap to the conclusion that this “commenting out” was done surreptitiously and, therefore, must be evidence of a “copy-paste” job. Did you notice how he tries to lead you there in his "programmer" comments?

Obviously, the purpose of the trap is simply to deflect you from your original observation about the ridiculous statement he made. He stated:

“even when FT uses a an non-TIR interfacing, most users pass that over for the TIR interfacing for its quality.”

Clearly, this statement is also only meant to provoke another reaction. I say to Wolf-Rider, trolls can not herd cats.

[albx]

Originally Posted by MadBlaster

Albx, watch your six in the future. This was a smoke bomb trap set up by the W-R.

Step 1) W-R sets up the trap by saying this C++ script is a "copy-paste" job to generate an expected reaction from you.

Step 2) W-R makes a few casual "programmer" type comments about the script to make you think he has some proof that it is a "copy-paste" job. As you see, I could not get a simple "yes/no" answer from him that these were his words. Instead, he tried to trick you into thinking they were a part of post #96 from that "other/another" poster when you called him out on them. Pretty sneaky crap going on here.

Step 3) W-R conveniently forgets to remind you that this script has probably gone through a few versions of Freetrack, leading you to possibly leap to the conclusion that this “commenting out” was done surreptitiously and, therefore, must be evidence of a “copy-paste” job. Did you notice how he tries to lead you there in his "programmer" comments?

Obviously, the purpose of the trap is simply to deflect you from your original observation about the ridiculous statement he made. He stated:

“even when FT uses a an non-TIR interfacing, most users pass that over for the TIR interfacing for its quality.”

Clearly, this statement is also only meant to provoke another reaction. I say to Wolf-Rider, trolls can not herd cats.

sure i will, ty MadBlaster